General Question

prolificus's avatar

How has environmental racism affected you or someone you know?

Asked by prolificus (6583points) October 18th, 2010 from iPhone

I came across the term environmental racism (ER) today, while looking up information on inequality and public transit. ER occurs whenever there’s unfair distribution of environmental resources due to socioeconomic differences, or wherever pollutants and carcinogens are concentrated in a minority community while sparing non-minority communities. New Orleans and the aftermath of Katrina would be a good example of ER, as people of color faced more challenges and less assistance due to inequitable distribution of resources and environmental barriers.

Are you aware of any examples of ER in your community, region, or state? What has been the lasting effect of ER?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

16 Answers

crisw's avatar

In San Diego, auto recycling/dismantling facilities and metal plating facilities, both of which produce tremendous amounts of toxic pollutants, are located entirely in minority and low-income areas. This has been a thorn in the side of local activists for years.

Many of these facilities are EPA-listed toxic waste sites that require millions of dollars of mitigation to be made safe.

MissAnthrope's avatar

It hardly counts as ‘racism’ because the majority of people affected are white, but there is definitely an unfair distribution of pollutants in West Virginia. The state is economically depressed and chock full of chemical plants, power plants, mountaintop removal mining, destroyed streams, defunct mines pouring out acid mine drainage, horrible air quality..

Higher rates of cancer, respiratory problems, not to mention many of these families rely on hunting and fishing to feed their families, so they are also ingesting toxic residues in these meats. Particularly bad is the fish situation.. the waterways in WV are a real shame; they are full of chemicals, which has caused mutant fish in some cases.

The state is essentially run by big business (Dow Chemical, big coal & power, etc.). No one wants these things in their state, and the rest of the country seems to feel that WV is a throw-away state, like who cares, right? The people have almost no power.. residents have been protesting mountaintop removal mining for years and big coal just laughs at them and keeps on, polluting the air, ruining mountains, completely stopping streams in these valleys, and drastically changing ecosystems. The EPA somehow – and that is what really blows my mind – turns a blind eye. I guarantee these practices would not past muster in most of the other states.

Feel free to flag this because I realize I’m not answering your question 100%, but I felt it relevant to point out that there are a lot of disadvantaged people having unfair, unhealthy things done to them, regardless of race.

thekoukoureport's avatar

We spend too much time with the racisim card but we fail to recognize that’s it’s usually just the poor that get screwed and it’s not a racial problem because poor knows no color.

iamthemob's avatar

@thekoukoureport – I agree with you on a certain level. Unfortunately…race and class are collapsed for the most part, so one can almost be used as a proxy for the other. This differs depending on the geographic region in the U.S. as well as the world…but if we look at the developing world and the developed world, poor communities in the developed nations, the overwhelming majority of the people of color live in an economically depressed states.

anartist's avatar

The Wikipedia article that is the basis for this question is wildly incorrect. The first line, “Environmental racism refers to the enactment or enforcement of any policy, practice, or regulation that negatively affects the environment of low-income and/or racially homogeneous communities at a disparate rate than affluent communities.”

It is a very slippery slope when one equates “low-income” with a racial or ethnic group. The very reason these resources are allotted unevenly is the economic factor. Better choices of neighborhoods and with that better schools and better transportation are based on the ability to pay for them and to pay higher taxes on them. As more people of diverse groups succeed, so are these folks more likely to enjoy better neighborhoods and amenities.

iamthemob's avatar

@anartist

I think, however, that ignores the fact that racism is a major contributing factor in, essentially, ghettoizing certain racial groups into areas of low income. There, they will have less opportunity generally. If the environment is corrupted, even less. Housing gentrification and gerrymandering can assist in this effect as well…and the class isolation benefits a racist “us and them” mentality.

I understand the potential negative implications of equating low income with certain racial and ethnic groups. However, when we look at why this is, we can reasonably state that part of it is due to racism. Therefore, to end the analysis at the point where low income areas are low income because of economic factors alone is to prevent us from asking why the majority of people in those areas, in general, are of a certain racial or ethnic makeup.

thekoukoureport's avatar

If we begin to look on it from an economic level than we can begin formulating concrete steps to fix the problem. Lack of proper education, declinning manufacturing, and an unsafe living environment are all socio-economic problems.

Lumping it into race usually leads these types of discussions down uproductive lines.

iamthemob's avatar

@thekoukoureport – I agree in a sense. My point is that if you use an economic standpoint and ignore the racial element, it’s easy to say “Well, they’re poor because they can’t make it as productive people – why should we support them if they’re just going to fail?” If we recognize that there is a racist element, and that because of historically supported discrimination we’ve gotten this result, then it’s more valid to take dollars from other areas and put it into the economically depressed areas.

thekoukoureport's avatar

But the other side of the tracks exists in all races. West Virginia is a perfect example @MissAnthrope is totally correct in that poor peolple can’t afford to fight with lawyers to defend their lands. The steel factories in Ohio, Pittsburgh, West Virginia are all white people. By demonizing a race because of their economic status is missing the entirety of the evergrowing problem. 15 million unemployed, should we only demonize the minority, or should we find productive ways to get all the people back to work.

The Marcellus shale gas deposit is a perfect example of race not an issue, because the poor people there are white. But they are getting screwed nonetheless. If that was Chester County or any rich county around Philadelphia, good luck getting a whiff of gas out of the ground.

Since our education system is funded by the local economy how do you think the poor are ever able to work themselves out. Sure we can always point to examples of success as “See so and so succeeded so everyone else can” but that is not seeing the overall scope of the problem. 1 bright star to point to so that we can feel comfortable at night is ignoring the evergrowing problem that will eventually if not already spill into the streets. POVERTY! and more and more are falling there faster. We need to humanize this problem by NOT making this a racial issue but an American issue.

iamthemob's avatar

@thekoukoureport

By demonizing a race because of their economic status is missing the entirety of the evergrowing problem.

I wouldn’t advocate demonizing a race because of their economic status. My argument isn’t stating that there’s poverty because of race, but rather racism is a contributing factor. That doesn’t say anything about the underlying characteristics of a race, but how people’s perceptions contribute to the problem.

It’s a double-edged sword in some ways, you’re right. But there is a way to accept that racism (again, not race) plays a role in economic blight without arguing that it’s either because of racism or because of race. Therefore, there are other causal issues that we take into account (such as regionalism, general education theories, general allocation of resources, etc.). Racism is based on those that are in power making assumptions about people that are not “like them” or attempting to reinforce structures so that they keep the power they have. Therefore, racism helps to cause the collapsing or coincidence of economic depression and race, and then can use the fact that minorities are, on average, economically underprivileged as proof that they are inferior in some way shape or form. The issue of defining environmental racism as the Wikipedia page does has problems, I agree…but it also shows a mechanism through which different racial groups are made to be economically underprivileged.

I think it would be better if the term were “economic discrimination” rather than “economic racism”, but the term economic racism does not only enforce racist notions or ignore other issues, it also helps reveal how economic privilege and race can be actively collapsed into each other through our own actions as a society and those taken by our government.

Ivy's avatar

Absolutely. I live in the Southwestern U.S., a land of Native reservations. In the last ten years we’ve seen our air quality go from pristine to dangerously polluted as our region became an industrial energy zone at the expense of the land and its people’s health. Our region is already burdened with two of the most polluting coal-fired power plants in the country, and “they” are trying to get clearance to build a third plant in an area already adversely impacted by the legacy of two large coal plants within a huge coal complex. Desert Rock, as proposed, would be a 1,500-megawatt mine-mouth, coal-fired power plant built by Sithe Global LLC (Sithe) on the Navajo Nation on a 580-acre site.

This is a quote from the Navajo people in response to this 3rd coal powered plant:
“Coal-fired power plants are a dangerous and obsolete form of industrial technology in a world of possible alternatives. Is a human soul worth $16 a month? Would you sell your backyard for the construction of a toxic facility? Do we still have a voice in our nation? Is our health still considered? Why do we elect officials if we have no say? Think about how our kids will feel while wearing goggles and an oxygen mask, knowing their lives will be shorter than their parents’.”

On October 6, 2010, there was this press release (http://www.npca.org/media_center/press_releases/2010/groups-urge-epa-to-finalize.html) from from the National Parks Conservation Association with this heading: EPA Urged to Protect Parks from Coal Plant Haze ~ Groups Urge Agency to Finalize Rule that Protects Southwest National Parks and Wilderness Areas from Preventable Coal Plant Haze. If you love the Grand Canyon, Monument Valley or Arches, you know this isn’t just a loss to the Navajo and others who share this land.

It’s clearly an act of environmental racism. What kind of racism haven’t Native people been the victim of in the history of the U.S.? “Sure you can trust the government. Just ask an Indian.”

SuperMouse's avatar

There is a part of the city where I live that has a large concentration of lead in the soil. Because it is in a less affluent part of town, the residents do not have the funds readily available to clean it up.

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

In the 1890s, the Florida city in which I live was a small village getting ready to put a branch of railroad in from the mainline on the opposite side of the bay. Black laborers were imported from south Georgia to lay the track and build the passenger and industrial facilities in town. Up until that time, there was only one local black family, headed by an orchard man who, for the previous twenty years, had lived and worked a large section of land he had homesteaded that stretched from the south edge of town to the bay. History shows the patriarch, Gillespie, took part in commerce and was respected by town merchants and by his neighbors, all white homesteaders.

In came the black railroad laborers and, soon after, their families arrived. They settled at the south edge of town on Gillespie’s land in a dogpatch of self-built shacks. A community of sorts was formed. The women soon found employment as domestics. When the railroad was completed, many of these families stayed on and this became the town’s segregated black section.

Over the next twenty years, they built churches and developed their own small business section. They provided common labor and domestic help for the wealthy and middle class of he city and, at times, they were a political football for the powerful. Unemployment was traditionally high in the black section and sometimes there was trouble. To many poor and working class whites, the black people of the south side of town represented serious job competition and were considered an expendable nuisance.

I have found documentation of two lynchings from this period. In one newspaper article from 1919, a black man was hung from a telegraph pole on the south edge of downtown and while still alive, beaten, cut upon (ears, nose and privates were taken as souvenirs) and shot numerous times. The article states that a “woman in furs known to us all” arrived in her chauffeured sedan with the top down, stood up from the back seat and emptied a revolver into the pulverized body hanging from the pole. He was then lit on fire. The man was left hanging there for two more days until the town constable cut him down and took him to the black section of potters field.

So, as the village became a town and the town became a city, both the white and black sections grew. It became imperative around 1920 that a natural gas tank storage farm be placed near town to feed the white homes (Most black homes were on dirt roads, had no plumbing and certainly no electricity or gas at this time). The Gas Plant was plopped down right on top of this black section and caused the relocation of 90% of its population further south into the old Gillespie homestead—further from the white community in which most of them worked.

Eventually, over the next 40 years, this black diaspora became a string of well defined neighborhoods with two culturally rich business sections with one containing a small, but popular nightclub that, because of the connections of its owner, often featured major headliners such as Louis Armstrong, Bessie Smith, Charlie Bird Parker and eventually Dizzy Gillespie and Miles Davis when they were travelling through the chitlin circuit in Florida. Whites, except for some bohemians or beats such as Jack Kerouac (his mom lived in town), rarely patronized this club.

In the late 1960s the city decided it needed an overhead freeway feeder through to downtown. They put it through the areas that were historically black neighborhoods. This caused the expected noise and localized air pollution and general blight on the edges of the freeway, cut neighborhoods in half and killed two black, culturally rich, business areas. Today, if you look on a city map, you can see how contorted the freeway is; almost as if the planners were determined to hit every black neighborhood south of town.

By the mid 70s, these had become mean, isolated ghettos with no cultural foci. Today, this is where one goes to buy crack cocaine. The rapid staccato of automatic weaponry can be heard some nights coming from this side of town and police will not enter some of these areas unless absolutely necessary. There have been riots. It has become a black hole for federal, state and municipal improvement funding.

You can ask most people in town today, both white and black, from the mayor on down, about the old Gillespie Homestead, the Gas Plant, the famous little night club in the thriving black business section and the strange contortions our branch of the freeway takes through the south side of town, and they won’t know what you are talking about.

That’s Deep South environmental racism.

Ivy's avatar

@Espiritus_Corvus A really great answer! And you’ve inspired me to research Jack Kerouack’s mother.

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

Thanks and nice seeing you again, Ivy. Yeah, Jack’s mom lived here for a few years. He bought her a home in the sun with the proceeds from On the Road. He used come down and visit her every once in a while in the 60s. His alcoholism was pretty advanced by that time, though. I saw him once in a little poetry cafe where we kids used to go to buy our weed in little five dollar match boxes. He was old friends of the owner and used to hang out there to dry up. Sadly, when I saw him, he was shitfaced an making a bit of a scene.

One night, after a week of heavy drinking around town, he went home to his mom’s and started puking up blood in the middle of the kitchen. She called the ambulance and they took him to St. Anthony’s hospital downtown. Four hours and 26 units of blood later, he was dead. I’ve never heard of that much blood used on one patient. The doc knew him and liked his work. I’ve talked to one of the nurses who was in the OR at the time. She said they were ankle deep in blood. He died of Ascites due to advanced alcoholism. It’s a horrible way to go. I used to have a photocopy of the OR report. Really sad. That was in 1969.

Back in the early 90s, I was looking through our local phone book and came across his name. It was his mom’s old address. She had long since moved to Orlando where she passed away. He was still in the book every year after his death. This became a thing around town in the art community. Then after 1997 his name disappeared. That was the year his buddy Ginsburg died. We think Alan was keeping his name in the book as a kind of memorium.

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

I’m going to miss you Ivy/Dracool

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther