General Question

zensky's avatar

Which is more beneficial - walking 6 miles in the morning - or 3 miles twice a day?

Asked by zensky (13418points) October 15th, 2011

Would it be healthier to divide up the walk – do it in the morning and in the evening?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

10 Answers

janbb's avatar

I think dividing it might boost your metabolism more. I have read that 10 minutes 3 times a day is as good as 30 minutes once a day but that is hard to credit.

Judi's avatar

Both are great. Studies have shown (of course I can’t quote them, but they are always handing them out in my diet class) that short bouts are just as effective as long bouts of exercise.

chyna's avatar

I have no stats to quote, but I’m thinking that twice a day might be more beneficial. I could keep up a good pace for 3 miles, but after 5 I would be slowing down. So I would do 3 miles twice a day and keep up a fast pace more easily.

emeraldisles's avatar

I think the 3 miles twice a day would be better because you can really push yourself for the 3 miles and not tire out as fast. I would suggest interval walking and going up and down stairs or hills on your walk. Walk as fast as you can for 2 minutes , then reover at a ore moderate speed for 2 minutes and keep going.

marinelife's avatar

It’s basically the same.

Prosb's avatar

It’s hard for me to say. It might be pretty much the same in calories burned, or a continuous 6 miles might burn more, since you have no re-starting up time for your body to get into full swing burning the fat and building the muscle. However, I don’t know how long it takes the body to get into “workout mode.” The other thing that @chyna pointed out, is that if you can’t keep going for 6 miles, you might burn less than 2 sets of 3 miles where you were able to go full steam for each run.

But if you’re walking, I’d think a continuous 6 miles would be best.

YARNLADY's avatar

It depends on the goal. Most articles I have read on muscle toning and general health say it doesn’t matter either way. If you are specifically trying to increase your endurance the continuous walking would be better.

zensky's avatar

This has proved more difficult than I thought. It seems split between yay, nay and doesn’t matter. Most of my searches turned up reasons for splitting it up – but it depends on the kind of walking and cardio program around it.

I was thinking of a regular walk – 30 to 45 minutes twice a day. Would it be better than a straight one hour walk?

Response moderated (Spam)
chyna's avatar

If doing a regular walk, I would do it all in one walk. Since you aren’t power walking, getting tired wouldn’t be an issue with you.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther