General Question

Aesthetic_Mess's avatar

What is the word for "animalkind"?

Asked by Aesthetic_Mess (7894points) April 23rd, 2012

Collectively, we call humans “humankind” or “mankind”. Is there a collective word (just one word, not a phrase) that can be used for animals?
I’m writing an essay and I want to keep my sentences parallel. I used humankind, but I need a word for “animalkind”.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

14 Answers

jca's avatar

“Fauna,” as in “Flora and Fauna.”

rebbel's avatar

Animalia

ragingloli's avatar

Humans are a subset of animals, so “animalkind”, “fauna” does include humans.
If you want to denote the group of animals excluding humans, use “non-human animals”.

marinelife's avatar

the ‘animal kingdom’

janbb's avatar

I was at “the animal kingdom” too.

Jeruba's avatar

There’s also “all creatures great and small.”

JLeslie's avatar

@ragingloli I have never thought to include humans in with fauna. I do automatically include humans as animals.

josie's avatar

Critters

SavoirFaire's avatar

I don’t see what’s wrong with “animalkind.” Coin a term if that is what will work best—and it seems that it will work best given the desire to keep your sentences parallel. One thing to consider, however, is whether it will be clear to your audience what you are counting as an animal. For example: do you mean to be including insects?

Plucky's avatar

Animalkind/animal-kind isn’t off the mark. I think it is a term humans have created more recently though. I have used Animal Kingdom and Animalia before.

Nullo's avatar

“Animalkind” is a bit cumbersome, but it works to convey the idea of non-human creatures. You would not be the first person to assemble an appropriate word.

I don’t think that you can really have them be parallel, though. “Mankind” refers to the subset of creatures that are human, “kind” in this case being a relative of “kin,” or family – creatures that are related and so share major features. The “animalkind” concept is in fact a grouping of multiple different kinds. So far as accuracy in language goes, it would be better to simply say “non-human,” or rewrite the sentence so as not to say “humankind.”

Jeruba's avatar

Well said, @Nullo. I agree.

prasad's avatar

Animals?

zensky's avatar

^ well said.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther