General Question

rockfan's avatar

What do you think of the opening paragraph to my novel?

Asked by rockfan (14627points) January 17th, 2016 from iPhone

Lily gazed at the door in front of her. Unlike the bulletproof barriers that accompanied the sprawling rows of houses behind her, this particular door was made out of oak. A small, gray doorbell layed into the surrounding brick. It was a curious and amusing relic, Lily mused, her hand lightly caressing the worn surface.

The genre is dystopian science fiction, but it’s also a character piece. Do you think this paragraph does a good job showing right away that the story is set in the future?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

21 Answers

Seek's avatar

A small, gray doorbell layed into the surrounding brick.
This is either not a complete sentence, or the doorbell is an animate object. Either way, I’m confused.

It was a curious and amusing relic, Lily mused, her hand lightly caressing the worn surface.
This is redundant. We already know she’s musing, as she has stated she is amused. Also, is the door only amusing in the past tense, or is she currently amused by the door, from her perspective?

rockfan's avatar

Thanks. I wrote this in five minutes. I’ll definitely have to revise it lol

cazzie's avatar

I couldn’t work out if she was inside the house or outside the house. ‘in front of her’ is redundant. Doorbells are small, so that’s redundant, too, and it’s colour is meaningless. Why say ‘gazed’ when you can say ‘looked’ or perhaps ‘examined the strange door’ . Is the doorbell also a relic and a novelty? Imagine you are walking around in a medieval city and you came across a really strange gate or port from that time. It has a big iron knocker on it instead of what we would use now, a doorbell.
Here’s just a suggestion:

Lily stopped at the address she’d been given. The door wasn’t right. It didn’t fit in. It must never have been replaced with a bulletproof barrier like all the other houses on the over-crowded row. This door was wood, surrounded by brick with one of those old calling buttons beside it. She touched it, imagining its age. The wood was very old and smooth in spots, as was the doorstep below her feet, where it had been worn down by centuries of people passing through it.

ragingloli's avatar

I have not read any books in ages, but it does feel a bit like “bam, here it is”, while at the same time being mundane.
Like something should have been before it.
Like a general description of the environment.
Or mabye something big. Like an “explosion”.
For example the first line of the novel “the martian” is “I’m pretty much fucked.”.

stanleybmanly's avatar

There’s also the trouble discerning exactly which “worn surface” Lily’s hand is “caressing”, the door, brick or bell. “Bullet proof barriers” is no longer a hint that this tale takes place in a dystopian future. I would be more inclined to assume a dystopian location. I had no problem with Lily’s location. She’s facing a closed door because other houses are at her back, and it’s unlikely that she would be gazing at the doorbell from inside the house.

stanleybmanly's avatar

I think it is a nice start with the bullet proof barriers snatching the reader’s interest. The future thing could be easily solved with some simple device like “dimensionally polarized bullet proof barriers”.

Cruiser's avatar

I actually liked the imagery you invoked with your choice of descriptors. @Seek is spot on with her observations. I would think…

“It was a curious relic, Lily mused, as her fingers lightly caressed the worn(aged/antique) surface.”

would read better.

You hint at a societal turnabout with the employment of bullet proof doors vs this surviving wooden relic of what I infer is a distant past and you could really sell this moment by choosing the right adjective to hint as to what it is that is yet to be revealed.

Worn could suggest a violent past that this door survived, Antique could suggest this relic has survived centuries of change, Aged could hint at neglect and or abandonment and you then go one to reveal why this relic is so significant to your story.

These are those golden moments when you have that one chance to hook your reader into wanting to know more and continue reading. I now want to know what this door once led to…what was behind this door? Did it have a happy, sad or violent story to tell? Heck you could write a whole story centered around this wooden door!

Seek's avatar

It is a curious relic. She’s currently musing over the relic, not remembering how she mused over it.

CWOTUS's avatar

Lily gazed at the door in front of her. Unlike the bulletproof barriers that accompanied the sprawling rows of houses behind her, this particular door was made out of oak. A small, gray doorbell layed into the surrounding brick. It was a curious and amusing relic, Lily mused, her hand lightly caressing the worn surface.

Obviously, from context (because doorbells are on outside walls and not inside), we get that Lily is standing outside of the door to her house. What is not at all clear to me is why she would be standing outside her door gazing at it. Maybe that will be explained later, but for now I’m thinking that Lily is either leaving the house for the last time and getting a memory of it imprinted, or she’s somewhat simple. Who stands outside their door gazing at it?

I’m intrigued by what kinds of “bulletproof barriers … accompany” sprawling rows of houses. (And “sprawling” and “rows” are kind of oxymoronic. “Sprawling” indicates a disorderly arrangement, but “rows” are as tidy as can be.) But back to those “bulletproof barriers accompanying” those houses. Do you understand much about construction, weaponry and home security? No one would be likely to invest in “bulletproof” doors when walls are pretty easy to shoot through with any reasonably high-powered rifle. Because bulletproof doors are expensive, and bulletproof walls and windows would make the places unaffordable to most of the people who would still have to live there. (Bulletproof doors make more sense for buildings that are not detached frame houses, but something like concrete and brick apartment buildings, where one or two main entry doors might justify that expense, because the building itself is pretty secure – and the building contains many tenants to defray the cost.)

But even aside from that … are we talking about “bulletproof doors” at all? “Bulletproof barriers … accompanying” these houses is just such a strange way to say “bulletproof doors on houses”. Don’t aim for strange language and turns of phrase when you’re attempting to describe a strange scene. Use words and phrasing that are understandable in themselves so that your easily understood words and sentences can convey the strangeness that you mean to impart.

Better, in fact, to describe the doors on other houses as “heavy, flat metal doors with no adornment or seams to give purchase to crowbars, and no obvious weak points to be breached by generalized rifle fire”. Maybe not in so many words. “Show, don’t tell.”

The incomplete sentence describing the doorbell has been discussed. (You meant to say “laid”, but the sentence would still be incomplete.) Check how doorbells are attached to brick houses. In residential construction, the brick is not usually chiseled out to recess a place for the bell – too expensive. Usually the bell press is simply attached on top of the brick.

It’s not entirely clear which relic Lily is caressing, the doorbell or the door. Probably the door, I suppose, as it is a demonstrable “relic” if it’s not up to neighborhood security standards. Working doorbells – unless you have also improved upon this technology in your narrative – have not yet achieved “relic” status, whereas the door obviously has. (And we don’t actually know that this doorbell works, so it very well could be a relic, and hence that uncertainty. It’s likely that there isn’t a lot of foot traffic visiting in a neighborhood where folks have bulletproof doors, so even a working doorbell could be a relic.)

So I’m left wondering why in hell Lily is standing outside her door gazing at it and caressing it and thinking what a relic it is, in such a clearly unsafe neighborhood. Is she brain damaged, or does she have a death wish?

Jeruba's avatar

As a general practice, it’s a good idea to ask for feedback only after you’ve done all the revising you can. Rough drafts are a great way (the only way) to start, but you don’t leave the house in nothing but your underwear.

flutherother's avatar

I would set the scene firmly in the future first. To someone reading quickly it might not be obvious. The bulletproof barriers and the doorbell relic are clues that you can include but I would add some more detail leaving no doubt we are in the future.

PS I wouldn’t take these criticisms too seriously. I am reading some Philip K Dick at the moment and his writing isn’t perfect but it doesn’t matter because you get swept along by the story and the ideas.

Seek's avatar

You have no idea how many novels I have taken the red pencil to.

I find mistakes very distracting.

CWOTUS's avatar

I agree with @Seek. It’s awfully hard for me to read a novel if I’m mentally correcting the author’s grammar, syntax, and spelling, second-guessing his word choices and scratching my head wondering “Why the hell did the character do that?

Zaku's avatar

I think “accompanied” and “layed” should be replaced with other words, unless it’s a quirk of Lily that she uses weird words.

It didn’t evoke future dystopia for me – it evoked modern actual dystopia of places where most people make forts out of their homes. I didn’t like the simple collapse of “lack of fortress” with oldness.

But your vision didn’t throw me off, just the wording.

stanleybmanly's avatar

@CWOTUS Things fall into place precisely because Lily is gazing at an unfamiliar door, clearly not her own.

CWOTUS's avatar

@stanleybmanly, that just makes her action weirder. Who “gazes at” and “caresses” (really, “caress”?) a door to someone else’s house? On a street where the other houses have “bulletproof” doors…

tan253's avatar

What a great idea asking for observations on your novel! I have none as I feel I’ll have nothing further to give you – but good on you for sharing this – that must have been hard!

rockfan's avatar

@CWOTUS Well, caress means to touch something fondly. There have been many instances when I have touched an antique this way, especially antiques that I really liked, to feel the surface of it.

CWOTUS's avatar

Yes. I certainly understand what a caress is, and haven’t even forgotten how to do that. And that’s a pretty natural thing to do, with antiques and other objets d’art … which one owns, or has permission to touch, and enjoys the tactile experience, and feels safe in doing so. (I touch boats in that way when they merit the touch.) But you’ve started to describe a sort of residential war zone – of significant duration, if the owners of the sprawling rows of houses have had the time to put in bulletproof doors – so who stands outside of a “relic” of a door (not bulletproof – and that means that bullets can come out as easily as they go in, if the owner is feeling anxious or ornery) and caresses that weathered old door?

Caressing a door in any case is not a thing that people do, unless they’re building hand-crafted doors, perhaps. Doors aren’t boats. People don’t have the same feelings about them. You can prove me wrong by telling me the last time you did it, I suppose, or saw it done.

Okay, it’s a relic from a bygone day in a place where these types of things don’t exist any more, and in that sense it deserves some sort of recognition, maybe even awe. From inside the door, if she manages to get to the other side safely, the door can be properly attended to and remarked upon for its survival, its antique status. From the outside – in a neighborhood filled with bulletproof doors – it’s a barrier to her nominal safety on the other side.

Seek's avatar

I agree that the prolonged attention to the outside of the door is incompatible with a sense of danger and urgency that you might be attempting to convey.

An important part of dystopian fiction is the fact that old things exist, but no one has the luxury of appreciating them, or if they do, they must hide their appreciation. Think the real sugar packets in 1984, or the “kipple” in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?

valdasta's avatar

I haven’t read all the comments, but if you can handle the helpful criticism, you can improve your craft….keep on !

Just a word of encouragement.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther