Social Question

Dutchess_III's avatar

What is your favorite type of book or movie?

Asked by Dutchess_III (46811points) December 26th, 2016

I like true stories that are written as interestingly as fiction. Sacajawea and Seabiscuit come to mind first. Those are my favorite kinds of movies as well.

Do you prefer fiction or non fiction?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

25 Answers

Rarebear's avatar

Anything with space ships, laser beams, aliens, zombie, gunfights, or Kung-fu.

Rarebear's avatar

@ragingloli Does Ghost in the Shell count?

Coloma's avatar

Yep, I prefer based on true stories history, drama, thrillers etc. I am not a big fiction fan, and the truth is stranger than fiction a lot of the time. haha
Biographies, historical pieces, westerns, war stories animal stories with factual backgrounds are my favorites too.

Rarebear's avatar

@ragingloli Oh. Anime porn. I just watched some on youtube—it’s pretty bad.

Sneki95's avatar

@Rarebear Don’t you dare compare Ghost in the Shell with that tentacle bullshit.

Books: the ones with a good plot and writing style. Usually not fantasy. I ain’t into dragons and aliens and shit.
Movies: animated. It would have to be very good to be non animated and still have my likeness.
Unless it’s hentai. Fuck that. sorry @ragingloli

Call_Me_Jay's avatar

I go in long streaks. I used to read lots of science history and WW II history.

For the past couple of years it’s been detective/spy/crime novels. Partly it’s to keep up with my mother’s interests – she likes to send me books and discuss. I’m looking forward to the Sara Paretsky novel she gave me for Christmas. I’ve never read her, and the private investigator character V. I. Warshawski is a Chicagoan so there will be lots of familiar background for me.

For spy novels I’ve been re-reading John le Carre. I’ve always liked everything he writes.

Le Carre is kind of a reporter – he looks for upcoming hot points and investigates and writes novels around them. Eight years ago he published A Most Wanted Man about Germany dealing with Islamic militants alongside normal Muslim immigrants. This week it’s in the headlines.

A couple of HIGHLY recommended favorites are Martin Cruz Smith’s books about Moscow investigator Arkady Renko, and Henning Mankell’s stories of Swedish police inspector Kurt Wallendar.

ragingloli's avatar

@Sneki95
There is nothing better than tentacles

Love_my_doggie's avatar

We must NEVER dismiss tentacles!!! Need I remind anyone that we Jellies have them in copious supplies?

OP – I frequently read the Internal Revenue Code. Good times…

ragingloli's avatar

@Sneki95
You need to be filled by them.

Sneki95's avatar

@ragingloli No thanks. Keep those away from me.

Pachy's avatar

Sci-fi, esp. time travel
Romance
Theatrical adaptions
Old movies from thirties and forties
Off-beat
Everything else

Mimishu1995's avatar

Recently I realized that I can read and watch pretty much anything as long as it has a big emotional impact on me. That said, it doesn’t mean I don’t have any preference. I don’t like the type of obvious tear-jerking stories like someone strugging from obvious problems (poverty, diseases…), that’s too predictable. I want something that catches me off guard, or has multiple meanings and begs me to dig deeper in order to understand. Some people think this attitude is silly and they don’t want to waste energy mulling over a movie or book. I don’t care, they are art and they need to be appreciated.

Maybe this has something to do with my love for orginality. I love anything that sounds strange, like something I have never heard of before. This synopsis is an example. It means that even fantasy or sci-fi can be accepted as long as it’s off-the-wall, though I don’t like fantasy and sci-fi.

Ad call me when you see any film-noir!

Seek's avatar

I like fantasy and science fiction.

When I’m vegging in front of the TV by myself I watch a lot of murder mysteries and historical costume dramas.

Rarebear's avatar

@Sneki95 I wasn’t comparing, per se. I just had never seen the word before so I was asking for an example. I thought Rags was just talking about regular anime. I really didn’t know, so I apologize if I offended.

Berserker's avatar

Horror. Zombies and shit. Fuckups with masks killing teens with crappy 80’s hair. That.

filmfann's avatar

Dystopia. The fall of governmental rule and social structures.
The Stand, Day Of The Triffids, War Of The Worlds, and The Hunger Games.

ucme's avatar

Books: I likes da ones wit pikchas & that.
Movies: Horror, me & my daughter both.

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

Histories, ancient and modern, and Biographies are heavily represented on my bookshelves, now almost all ebookshelves. I read some fiction, usually in relation to a historical period in an effort to understand the culture of that period. Fiction from 1970 forward is not well represented on my bookshelf, but political histories concerning events up to 2016 are. These are not the books written by pundits, these are histories written by academic historians and academically respected journalists. The same goes for Art, Music and Film—these collections are all assembled in an attempt to get acquainted with the people who lived in the periods in which the pieces were created.

As to film, I really don’t like many from the 70’s. It was a period of transition from romance to realism in Hollywood and they just fucked up royally because the generation that was producing the films had absolutely no understanding of the generation that was demanding the films. Every blue moon from the 80’s forward they’ve made a good film or two. But you can keep most of your science fiction and all your super heroes, vampires and zombies.

My favorites are from the 30’s throught the 50’s. Especially Film Noir. I like the dressed-to-kill femme fatales, the men in fedoras, the cars, the slang and the code meant to cover the unmentonable subjects of the period.

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

Edit above, 3rd paragraph: “I really don’t like many from the 60’s and 70’s

Mimishu1995's avatar

<Give @Espiritus_Corvus a hug and dress him in a trench coat and fedora hat and give him a colt>

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

^^ You sound like you know your stuff, kid. Maybe we should get together for a drink sometime. But don’t flatter yourself. That’s just a Colt in my pocket.

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

One of my favorite Noir films is The Big Sleep, 1946, from the 1939 novel by the king of risque LA pulp fiction, Raymond Chandler. Script adaptation was by the famous southern novelist William Faulkner, direction by Howard Hawks, with Humphrey Bogart, Lauren Bacall, Martha Vickers and Dorothy Malone.

Chandler’s books about private detective Philip Marlow were the closest thing to pornography that could legally be published at the time. Packed not with just the regular assertive Noir femme fatales, but with decidedly sexually aggressive female characters, (that was young Martha Vickers) The Big Sleep addressed taboo—and thus heavily censored—subjects such as pornography, the sexual enhancement apparatus known at the time as the Singapore Sling, homosexuality, bisexuality, BDSM, hard drug use (in the book, the girl played by Martha Vickers is found nude and helplessly strapped into a suspended “Sling”) – all in a web of love triangles, blackmail, murder, gambling, and organized crime. The film was so heavily censored that the plot is almost lost and requires multiple viewing to fully understand what it is actually about beyond a run-of-the-mill detective story. It is arguably the most “coded” film of the Noir period.

Here, Bogart and Bacall meet in a lounge and discuss “horses” starting at 01:35.

Horses

LOL. Make of that what you will.

In the book, Marlow enters Geiger’s Bookstore, a front for a highly illegal pornography operation. He disguises himself as a flamboyant homosexual in order not to be suspected as a “private dick.” Bogart took the Chandler/Faulkner scene and ran with it resulting in it being retaken multiple times due to on-set censors. Homosexuality in film was super-taboo. In the end Hawks discovered what the censors were really upset about: they had a problem with Bogart lisping too heavily, so Hawks suggested he lighten it up. Bogart did. Kinda:

Geiger Bookstore Scene

Dorothy Malone had been on screen for only 2 ½ years, acted in 14 films during that time, mostly in walk-ons and bit parts with only 3 credited roles. The Big Sleep was her Big Break and the 20 year-old actress was so nervous in her scene with big star Bogart that they had to weight the bottom of the liquor glass to dampen her shaking hands in this scene in the Acme Book Shop across the street from the pornographer’s studio:

Acme Bookstore Scene

Due to censorship, Bogart’s character can’t talk about the taboo subject of pornography on film and his description of what goes on across the street had to be re-written multiple times on the set—to both Faulkner’s and Chancelor’s loud protests—and the subject is smoothly diverted when Malone takes off her glasses. The conversation occurs at 00.45 in the above Acme Bookstore scene:

Malone: “Tell me more about this business.”
Bogart: “Well, there’s not much to tell, I, uh….
Malone: “What?”
Bogart: “I was just wondering if you have to, uh…” [Indicates her eye glasses.]
Malone: “Oh. Not necessarily.” [Removes glasses]
Bogart: “Well, Helloooo!”

LOL. Most people who saw the film and never read the novel were clueless as to what the film was actually about and it was murdered by equally clueless critics for being too hard to follow. People complain about this even today on the net.

I love this film for it’s reflection of the dated sensibilities of the period, the hoops Hawks had to jump through to make it, and the fun of decoding the dialogue. And besides all that, it really is a great detective film.

Ha. According to Lauren Bacall, production was such fun, that they got a memo from Jack L. Warner saying “Word has reached me that you are having fun on the set. This must stop!”

Here’s Chandler’s novel, The Big Sleep:
http://www.paolocirio.net/work/amazon-noir/amazon-noir-books/AMAZON-NOIR--The_Big_Sleep--By--Raymond_Chandler--0394758285.pdf, in manuscript form, in PDF format.

Excellent digitized prints of the complete film can be seen for $2.99 at Vudu, iTunes, Amazon Video, or for free Here after downloading the plugin WowMovix onto Chrome. I have no idea what the plugin will do to your computer. I have my own copy downloaded from a torrent long ago. You might just want to pay the $2.99.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther