General Question

TrenchantWit's avatar

Im in the process of building a computer...

Asked by TrenchantWit (290points) November 16th, 2008

ive been out of the game for a while, is there a big difference between a quad core 2.4, 2.8, or 3.0GHz or am i just gonna be wasting my money for the small boost. i do a lot of gaming and downloading off of usenet. what do you guys recommend?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

8 Answers

TrenchantWit's avatar

oh yeah i plan on getting the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 1GB graphics card also

TheBox193's avatar

You have to balance it. How much are you willing to spend for greater computing power? It each upgrade will cost you more than the previous. Personally I would get the 2.8 GHz. I don’t think the price for the difference .2 GHz (well i guess .2 times 4) for the 3.0GHz justifies the price.

Quad Core 2.8GHz

aanuszek1's avatar

I agree with box, you have to remember, with that one fifth of a gigahertz, you’re actually paying for four fifths. How much RAM do you intend on using? If more than 4 gigs, defiantly get the 3 Ghz.

eambos's avatar

Dont get the GX2, get the Radeon HD 4870 1G. It is a beast. I have one and love it. Crysis maxed setting 1680×1050 at an average of 48fps, lowest it hit ever hit was 29fps

As for the processor, if you know a thing or two about overclocking, go for the lower clock, the penryn core intels overclock amazingly. Otherwise, id go with the 2.8Ghz. They charge much more for the 3Ghz than necessary.

joeysefika's avatar

You don’t need a quad core. Say a 2.8Ghz Dual Core is better than a Quad Core 2.4Ghz. What’s this? you might say, 2×2.8 is only 5.6Ghz, where as 2.4×4 = 9.6Ghz. In reality most programs, including Crysis, etc can only use 2 cores at once. So unless you’re running 2 games of Crysis at the same time you only need a Dual Core processor, like a 3Ghz Dual Core, it’ll save you lots of money compared to a Quad Core. A Dual Core 3Ghz will overclock to 3.8 – 4.2Ghz comfortably with a good CPU fan.

eambos's avatar

—I’m running a Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16Ghz OC’d to 4.0Ghz, with a nice aftermarket cooler. I might go higher, but then I’ll have to consider water cooling.

As joey said, most current gen programs do do not even utilize all four cores. Save yourself almost $200 and buy an E8400 or E8500, then use the extra cash and get a better GPU b

joeysefika's avatar

Make sure you don’t cheap on the Motherboard either, have one with 2 PCI-E slots, therefore if you want to upgrade in the future just bung a second graphics card in. Like this one only $220 AUD

kullervo's avatar

For a gamer you need to look at not just the clock speed but also the cache. If there is a big difference in the amount e.g.the Q8200 is 2.33ghz and the Q9450 is 2.66ghz and may not seem much difference but when you look at the L2 cache the Q8200 only has 4mb compared to 12mb on the Q9450 so you are getting 3 times as much L2 cache and 1.32ghz faster processing (.33×4) making the Q9450 wipe the floor with the Q8200.

I’d recommend avoiding the bleeding edge fastest model as you pay a premium price and get more bang for your buck at the next model or 2 down. Try to get ram that can match the Front side bus of your processor if possible. Faster ram is better than more ram for gaming. So better to have 2GB of super fast, low latency, dual channel ram from a company like Corsair than have 4GB of standard/slow ram. For video/image editing huge files more ram may be more important than speed.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther