Why aren't cartoon animals anatomically correct?

I would go with the last thing you said. Also no one wants to look at Scooby Doo’s balls.

Perhaps Scooby has been neutered?

A related question is why in the world do both cows and bulls in Back at the Barnyard (and the original movie) have fully developed udders?

Because the act of sex has nothing to do with a fictitious character. Unless we are talking about Fritz the Cat.
He and his friends had the tools.

Hmmm… well, first off, exactly how do you think some cartoon characters can look male or female? As far as scooby doo goes, not only will testicles and a penis be slightly inappropriate, but its an extra thing to draw. Animators want to keep it simple. Personally though, I think scooby looks pretty male. I don’t see anything particular that could confuse me on that. Usually,, artists will use eye lashes and make up to signify that the character is female, and a more slender body. Scooby looks scraggy and not very pretty, so, he’s pretty male to me.

But really, all in all, I highly doubted that the creators of these show wanted to sexual-ize, even in the slightest bit of drawing reproductive parts. It would have turned off some viewers and made it inappropriate for kids. Back in the day, there was a huge argument between parents and animation companies about keeping the cartoons clean, even of slight violence like fighting between superman and his villains,

Did not stop my Gi-Joe from getting it on with Barbie.

Because they are child like and innocent. Anyone can tell when characters have sexuality they lose their innocence. Even Family Guy is not for kids. What age should they be? Will they be sexually mature? That’s creepy. Will they be like children? That’s unacceptable to many.
But it may be interesting to note that often in Scandinavian countries they don’t avoid giving their little boy or girl dolls secondary sexual characteristics. Probably a lot less confusing than the non existent sexes in American dolls.

Because the thought of seeing testicles on Marmaduke or Scooby scares the h-e-double hockey sticks out of viewers! It’s not just animals either, we don’t see bulges in Freddie or Shaggy’s pants – thank goodness!

In addition to that, I would really hate to have to explain to my kids exactly what they are seeing when Goddard rolls on his back for Jimmy Neutron to scratch his tummy. It is just not the right forum or demographic to be a jumping off point for the birds and the bees discussion. My personal thanks to all the animators out there who keep us from having to discuss these things too soon!

It’s an interesting peek at your psyche that when you discuss the anatomical incorrectness of cartoon characters you focus entirely on genitalia.

What about the fact that most of them are quadrupeds but they move about like bipeds. How about Mickey and Minnie’s hands, feet and ears are swollen to 20 times their normal size? How about the Duck family having fingers? How about Bugs Bunny’s fingers and his unnaturally attenuated body? How about the rampant dwarfism among male human cartoon characters?

Then there is the unexplained human vocal apparatus in virtually every cartoon creature except ducks and ducks that spit. There is nothing that can explain how they can sing and dance.

There is so much that is wrong about cartoons that it feels like your obsession with their sexual organs is a little excessive.

well, that answers that question. Thanks for an insight into a subject I was obviously looking at from a pervert’s POV.

This one is probably on the Fluther Overlords’ Top Ten List of Mentally Deranged Questions. bows

@gailcalled, lets keep my obsessions out of it, okay? If you want to judge me, find a jury of my peers first, hmmm?
Besides, ever heard of a concept called HUMOR? Scatological and sexual humor to be exact?? This is one of those tongue-in-cheek questions that are outside the lines or normalcy But you keep projecting what you like upon me, I find it quite amusing. =)

@ChazMaz I’d give you a hundred more lurve points, simply for making me laugh this morning. GA.

probably because they dont need to be…cartoons are simple in style and thats why they are cartoons and not something else…i mean i very much doubt the makers of scooby to were aiming for a depiction of real life

Sorry, I meant @galileogirl not @gailcalled, mea culpa.

Exactly where would I find a jury of your perv..er..peers?lol

So we don’t have to see their cartoon junk.

Scooby-do would be licking himself, rather than solving crimes, or asking for scooby-snacks.
I think Ren and Stimpy were anatomically correct. So were Bart in the Simpsons movie, and South Park, but they aren’t animals of course.

@galileogirl obviously not in your neighborhood. =)

If they look like baby faces people will find them cute. It’s a human instinct.

The genitilia of Donald duck would be internal only showing its self occasionally. On Scooby Doo, Marmaduke, both are dogs, and dogs have sheathes. The penis would be in that sheath. The sheath would be smaller in size without the penis showing. Genitilia should match the species as close as possible.. It will look better that way. The genitalia would enhance the characters. We would be looking art them at first because we are not used to seeing the natural part on animation. Whenever it is done should be done like it would be seen in nature. That means not being exaggerated.The cartoon character would carry that part like it had it its entire life, and though nothing of it. When it was cold in an animation the balls would be closer to the body, and when it was hot farther away from the body. The showing of the penis coming out could enhance the emotional response of the cartoon character too, and how relaxed they were too. Having them would enhance the masculinity of the character too. But the character would act the same, and sex would not necessarily have to take place ether. A whole cartoon could take place with no sex taking place.

@kobidobidog1
Everything does not have to be literal. Believe it or not mice are not the size of dogs either. They’re fuckin’ cartoons for crissake.

@SeventhSense “They’re fuckin’ cartoons for crissake.”

Not if they don’t have genitals.

@Darwin
Ah yes perhaps the most versatile word in the English language. And from the great wordsmith George Carlin, here’s a true masterpiece:

George Carlin – The History And Many Uses Of The Word Fuck

Perhaps one of the most interesting words
in the English language today, is the word FUCK.
Out of all of the English words which begin with the letter F, FUCK is the only word referred to as the “F” word, it’s the one magical word.
FUCK as most words in the english language,
is derived from German,
the word “fricken[?]”, which means to strike.
In English, FUCK falls into many grammatical categories.

As a transitive verb, for instance.
John FUCK-ed Shirley.
As an intransitive verb, Shirley FUCKS.
It’s meaning’s not always sexual;
it can be used as an adjective, such as
John’s doing all the FUCK-ing work.
As part of an adverb,
Shirley talks too FUCK-ing much.
As an adverb enhancing an adjective,
Shirley is FUCK-ing beautiful.
As a noun, I don’t give a FUCK.
As part of a word abso-FUCKING-lutely,
or in-FUCKING-credible.
And, as almost every word in the sentence,
FUCK the FUCK-ing FUCK-ers.

As you must realize,
there aren’t too many words
with the versatility of FUCK.
As in these examples describing situations
such as fraud,
I got FUCK-ed at the used car lot.
Dismay, Aw FUCK it.
Trouble, I guess I’m really FUCK-ed now.
Agression, Don’t FUCK with me buddy.
Difficulty, I don’t understand this FUCK-ing question.
Inquiry, Who the FUCK was that?
Dissatisfaction, I don’t like what the FUCK is going on here.
Incompetence, He’s a FUCK-off.
Dismissal, Why don’t you go outside and play hide-and-go-FUCK yourself?

I’m sure you can think of many more examples.
With all these multi purpose applications,
how can anyone be offended when you use the word?
We say, use this unique, flexible word more often in your daily speech.
It will identify the quality of your character immediately.
Say it loudly, and proudly!
FUCK you!

They are not anatomically correct with genitalia because subconsciously humans are apposed to life, and God who is life that made all of the life around us and ourselves included, and are offended by ,and as result think genitalia ,and sheaths that house the genitalia in dogs etc are disgusting not realizing they are calling God disguising too. This is why humans can so easily accept the altering of dogs to make them look just like,....well almost just like the genderless cartoons. The altered dogs still have a atrophied ,and shriveled up sheath. Whoever does put genitals on the existing animated ,and new ones that are furry,movies, and or back on the Narnia movies should represent the species as close as possible to enhance the character not to distract from the character. This will give a whole new dimension in animation not yet seen. Just because genitalia or a penis is seen does not have to mean sex. I cannot over emphasizes that fact..

@Darwin All things would be done to enhance whoever, and done to ,and the more real the animation the more convincing genitalia sheathes would be, and the more virtual life could be given too the animated character. A sheath on bugs bunny like what was seen briefly in one animation will not hurt anyone anymore than a leaf of a tree. humans are irrational about normal things. Stop being violent toward this,the zoosexuals too while you are at it,and love whoever keeping the whole law of God.

All things would be done to enhance whatever animation. The more real the animation the more convincing genitalia sheathes would be, and the more virtual life can be given to the animated character. A sheath on bugs bunny like what was seen briefly in one animation will not hurt anyone anymore than a leaf of a tree. humans are irrational about normal things. Stop being violent toward this,the zoosexuals too while you are at it,and love whoever keeping the whole law of God.

@SeventhSense dogs have balls on them for Christs sake ,and humans are cutting them off for real. That is sick,and being against love is sick too.I am tired of the insensitivity of vain humans. I am also talking about the humans, yes humans I discovered late in life and they have the short end of the stick only getting hate never getting love back, and that is all the zoosexual has to give back to whoever just like God only has love to give back to us. Stop rejecting them, and the things God made treat genitalia, and the zoo with respect not rejection.

Genitalia are not inappropriate, and nether is God inappropriate for making genitals, and the sheath that contains the penis that would be on Scooby doo. We see them on life, and think nothing of them, and why make a fuss when seen on animation. When will humans learn that just because a sheath or genitalia is seen does not have to mean sex. The character can do an infinite number of things showing those parts, and not have sex at all.
Scooby doo is worse than neutered, his entire sexual organs have been removed sheath, and penis too. There is only one being that would want that, and it is Satan. We should thumb our noses at Satan, and artfully, and accurately, and as life like according to the species as possible put them on Scooby doo, and other animation too.

We all see balls on dogs.When anti ball humans don’t cut them off like they are a tumor. Done right with a sheath will complete Scooby Doo’ and end up making him look better that the other animation that does not have those parts.

drClaw (4333points You see normal balls on any other dog or are you happy with altering?

Satan is the one who is mortified with seeing balls and any sexual reproductive organ. Satan does not have one and wants yo have all of Creation not to have one,and wants us to also to despise the balls-testicles too, and Satan is sneering at all kinds of sex too. That is why there is a war against the sexualities.

Satan is the one who is mortified with seeing balls and any sexual reproductive organ. Satan does not have one and wants to have all of Creation not to have one,and wants us to despise t balls,ans -testicles,and sheathes on furry animation, and give the false impression that sex has to occur just because genitals are seen. We have to stop believing the lies of Satan. Satan is sneering at all kinds of sex too. That is why there is a war against the sexualities.

@kobidobidog- So are you saying that Satan is the one who is mortified with seeing balls and any sexual reproductive organ?

@AstroChuck Yes, I believe @kobidobidog is saying that Satan is the one who is mortified with seeing balls and any sexual reproductive organ.

@AstroChuck You are right,.and Satan if he could would destroy genitalia too,and has humans altering dogs doing just that with humans calling it good. Humans with Satan in them act mortified seeing furry nude, and Yiffing art too. That art should come out from behind the curtain,and have representations of genitalia on furry suits too. Humans should not be bothered if the real God made genitalia is seen ether. The being in humans who made it not is the one who wants to see it not. See it,and not be bothered, and Satan will not be in whoever.
Female parts are readily seen in animation,and to say to put the male part on is to expensive is a cop out. We need a middle road when the animation has the parts God intended with out sex always occurring. Each species should be considered , and to not just give each one genitalia that is human looking. To have them carry them with the innocence of a child who cares less that he is walking around with genitalia. The penis does not have to show all the time anyway like a penis of a dog does not always show.

I couldn’t agree more.

The character is not required to have sex just because the parts are seen.That is a lie, a misnomer. People need to get out of that mindset.

When God made the parts he did not say,...hide them, don’t let anyone see them. It will be an inappropriate thing to do.You will see my light as fire if you do that. God did not say that. Sex does not have to happen when a person see sexual parts.The parts have to be species specific as close as possible. They must be as life like in size and shape and location on the animal. The cat is more rearward.That is why they spray with their back side to whatever.. God knew what he was doing when he made them. Birds, penguins, seals, whales and dinosaurs are examples of species having internal sexual parts. Don’t people even think about this?

Pom Poko