General Question

jaketheripper's avatar

Is HD an appropriate term to use in reference to sound?

Asked by jaketheripper (2779points) September 15th, 2009

Whenever my friend and I would speak of hd radio, he would say that it is high fidelity not high definition. He said that the radio companies just used “high def” because consumers already understood the term, but that it wasn’t really appropriate. Is this true?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

13 Answers

aphilotus's avatar

Definition refers to the how close a picture matches it original, or real life. It almost always refers to pictures or videos.

Fidelity (as in truth) refers generally to how accurate a representaiton is, but has for at least the last half century been specifically related to radio and sound. Anymore, it almost always refers to sound.

Calling radio “HD RADIO” is… OK, and works if you are selling High Fidelity Radio to stupid people, but is not as correct as calling it HF RADIO.

AstroChuck's avatar

It’s fine. One of the definitions for definition according to dictionary.com is “Radio and Television. the accuracy of sound or picture reproduction.”

Sarcasm's avatar

In my head, it doesn’t seem right. It seems like “Definition” in terms of something’s quality should solely be visual. I’d opt to use “high fidelity” or just simply “high quality”.
But apparently it isn’t wrong, so I guess that’s just something I’ll have to live with.

DarkScribe's avatar

I wouldn’t use it that way. Sound isn’t “defined” the way an image is, but if it is true to the original then it has fidelity.

Zen's avatar

I like to define the sounds I hear. Sound okay to me, @DarkScribe

hearkat's avatar

As an Audiologist, I prefer to use the term “high fidelity” when discussing sound reproduction. However, from a marketing standpoint, “Hi-Fi” is a rather dated term, so I think they’re trying to give it a more modern, technologically-advanced sounding name that will appeal to consumers.

@DarkScribe and @Zen: The terminology I use professionally is sound “discrimination” (or sometimes “distinction” or “recognition”) rather than definition. It’s all semantics, and splitting hairs, of course.

aprilsimnel's avatar

Yes, hi-fi, while more accurate, is certainly dated. Darn it, I was hoping to find a clip of Fred Flintstone singing “Listen to the Rockin’ Bird” as Hi-Fi. Can’t find it, but it’s really great. Fred sounds just like Mel Tormé.

sandystrachan's avatar

HD sound is dolby 7.1 you find it on most blu-ray disks . Blu-ray gives better sound clarity . .

CMaz's avatar

It is marketing nonsense. Like “DVD quality”.

Zen's avatar

@hearkat I am intrigued: What is an Audiologist (training, studies, degrees and experience – please) and the semantics of it, I presume, go hand in hand with your profession – which also intrigue me. The semantics of it i.e.

hearkat's avatar

@Zen:
What Is An Audiologist?
Our profession may go by a different name in the country where you currently reside.
Feel free to PM with any additional questions, as I don’t want to hijack this post.

CMaz's avatar

“Blu-ray gives better sound clarity”

So you are saying if I have shot something. It had bad audio to begin with.
If I record it on to Blu-ray I will have better sound clarity?

Like I said, marketing nonsense for the neophyte.

What “HD’ was suppose to be and what it has become are two different beasts.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther