Social Question

ETpro's avatar

Yes it was clever. But was Samuel Johnson's advice to writers correct?

Asked by ETpro (34605points) August 28th, 2010

British poet, essayist, moralist and literary critic Dr. Samuel Johnson said, “Read over your compositions, and wherever you meet with a passage which you think is particularly fine, strike it out.” With all due respect to the great man of letters, it seems to me that if I followed this advice assiduously, I would end up with little left in the manuscript but a few disjointed sentences.

Granted it’s a clever bon mot, but can you name a single work Samuel Johnson wrote? No cheating. Name one off the top of your head, not by Googling for it. Doesn’t one have to wonder about the soundness of Johnson’s editing advice when today Johnson is best remembered for, Life of Samuel Johnson, which was written not by Johnson but by Scottish biographer James Boswell.

As taken with Johnson as Boswell obviously was, the younger man may himself have ignored this gem of editorial advice. Having met Dr. Johnson when he was just 22 years old, Boswell kept a series of Journals of his experiences and correspondence with the good doctor over a period of 32 years. When these were published, they filled 18 volumes.

What do you think Johnson meant by his advice? How do you edit and omit when you write for publication of for online distribution you really care about?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

10 Answers

Austinlad's avatar

I don’t take the quote completely literally—I think it means, Don’t fall too deeply in love with your own work and thus lose objectivity about its value. If you want to test this, write something you think is absolutely perfect, put it away for a few days, and then re-read it. If you’re like me, you’ll wonder how you could have thought it was so good and want to rewrite at least part of it.

ETpro's avatar

@Austinlad A very reasonable interpretation. I think he was stretching his point to… well, to make it sound “particularly fine”. :-)

Austinlad's avatar

@ETpro… precisely.

marinelife's avatar

I think that he meant you should not turn an admiring eye on your own prose, but be harsh with it.

aprilsimnel's avatar

I’ll excuse it. It’s just a bit of hyperbole to remind writers not to become too attached to their work.

Hawaii_Jake's avatar

You asked whether we could name anything Samuel Johnson wrote without cheating, and I actually can, “Preface to Shakespeare” in 1765.

:-)~

As to the other question, I like what has been written in the other answers here. Namely that we should not become enamored of our own wit.

Austinlad's avatar

A thread in which everybody agrees with everybody else. Is this is a first?

ETpro's avatar

@hawaii_jake Well done! GA to you.

@Austinlad I agree… Oops!

janbb's avatar

(I think it may have happened once before.)

I have nothing new to add to others’ fine responses but I love what I wrote – so I should probably strike this out.

ETpro's avatar

@janbb Ha! GA just fopr the nice laugh it brought me. :-)

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther