Is it a good or bad thing that neither candidate in Virginia or Montana are demanding a recount?
All responses welcome - from the perspective of liberals, conservatives, or the good of democracy.
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
Answers
I think it's a good thing. After the chaos of 2000, I personally am appreciative of candidates who are willing to accept things the first time around.
A good thing. The republicans are (somewhat) accepting the fact that the country is generally unhappy.
Given what happened in the last Virginia Attorney General recount, the republicans don't want to refight a battle they'll likely lose. They're saving strength for the much more important race in '08
allen and burns are history.. good riddance!
Answer this question 