Stuff about Rotwang

Rotwang’s awards

Comments

Questions

• October 8th, 2008

  Are PC case fans supposed to blow out or in to the case?

  Great Question (0)
• October 5th, 2008

  What does breathing into a paper bag really do?

  Great Question (3)
• October 2nd, 2008

  Where online can I watch the debate that just aired?

  Great Question (0)
• October 2nd, 2008

  What halloween costume should I wear?

  Great Question (0)
• September 30th, 2008

  What linux compatible HDTV and analog pci tuner card should I get?

  Great Question (0)

Browse all of Rotwang's questions…

Answers

• October 18th, 2008

  Should the Fluther mods be a bit more stringent in policing "tools?"?

  If you can think of a less “dramatic” way for me to have stated that, let me know. And because you continue to do this silly childish gimic of “oh look here comes yet another ‘last word’ in the argument”) I’ll do it to you, and you’ll see how empty this is: Wait for the beep everyone, here comes another post from gail. Yep she just can’t let it sit. That crazy gailcalled here she goes again!
  Great Answer (0)
• October 18th, 2008

  Should the Fluther mods be a bit more stringent in policing "tools?"?

  gailcalled, Unfortunately, these responses don’t have dates, so I don’t blame you for not realizing this detail: richardhenry’s post here came between my post last night and this morning. So in short; If people are still responding to me (and in the case of poofandmook, even asking me direct questions), should I really not respond? I could be equally accused of being unwilling to debate the subject. That seems straightforward.
  Great Answer (0)
• October 18th, 2008

  Should the Fluther mods be a bit more stringent in policing "tools?"?

  @poofandmook: I sure do, isn’t that courteously, to finish the conversation at hand? And thanks for not diminishing my argument into terms like, you know “hissy fit”. Or, referring to me as an “imbecile” (on the other thread), because you disagree with me.
  Great Answer (0)
• October 18th, 2008

  Should the Fluther mods be a bit more stringent in policing "tools?"?

  No, it doesn’t, at all. I’m not talking about a “conspiracy”. I’m talking about crappy policy. Nor have I said that you need to do anything “24/7”. You constructing a straw man here, and I’m not that straw man. What I’m arguing for is transparency. When you censor someone, we should be able to see who was censored and why. It should not be mysterious. We should not “just trust” you. And to this: “We remove the junk to keep the quality higher than any other Q&A site on the web, and we believe we do a good job.” Oh, yes, I DO believe that YOU believe that you do a good job.
  Great Answer (0)
• October 17th, 2008

  Do you find that fluther moderators target certain "patrons"?

  (in second person.)
  Great Answer (1)

Browse all of Rotwang's answers…