Stuff about manoffaith
manoffaith’s awards
Comments
Questions
Answers
-
August 19th, 2008
Wildflower: It seems as though most of your rationalizations for
utilizing pre-employment screenings stem from the concept that
whomever is responsible for the actual hiring process is wholly
incompetent.
The entire purpose of employing a Hiring Manager/HR Director/Recruiter
is to have someone on staff who is capable of reading and vetting
people based upon their interview.
If reading people is a skill you possess, it’s not that hard to
realize whether someone is an addict, boozer, charlatan or deviant
after speaking with them for more than ten minutes. Of course, you may
not pick up on something like: this person likes to get high on the
weekend, or, this person was arrested for public intoxication when
they were in college. And you shouldn’t have to. Because those things
have no bearing whatsoever on their ability to perform their job.
Let me make it a little simpler for you.
A drug test will not vet out an alcoholic. An experienced recruiter
will. Would you rather have in your employ a chronic drunk, or someone
who likes to get high?
A background check will not vet out someone who was fortunate enough
to buy/luck their way out of trouble enough times that they’ve never
been prosecuted. A hiring manager worth his or her salt would be able
to realize that a potential employee is a prick who figures that as
long as they get away with something, they’ve done nothing wrong.
I could keep on listing examples, but I don’t think you’ll make the connection, so I’ll make it easy for you:
Background checks are the last resort of a lazy employer. Aside from verifying the information provided on a resume (which often includes the question: “Have you ever been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor?”) and calling up your references, how much does your employer need to know?
For example Wildflower: Would you want your supervisor at 1–800-Flowers knowing about the restraining order your high-school boyfriend put out on you? Unless you come off like a complete headcase in the interview (which you probably would), the person or persons responsible for bringing you on should have no business snooping around in your personal life.
Just because someone had their identity stolen/got mixed up in a bad situation/prefers illegal drugs over legal ones doesn’t make them a bad person. A qualified recruiter would realize this, and recommend (or warn against) a prospect based on their own analysis.
Great Answer (1
)
-
July 25th, 2008
Great Answer (0
)
-
July 25th, 2008
Great Answer (1
)
-
July 25th, 2008
Great Answer (0
)
-
July 25th, 2008
Great Answer (0
)
Browse all of manoffaith's answers…