Send to a Friend
Why will you seldom need to refer to the Carbolic Smoke Ball case? (UK legal)
)
October 31st, 2010
I am attempting to answer this question. However I am finding myself stumped. Because this case (Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co) [1893] is an authority on the reward type of advertisement, where a unilateral offer may be created, I’m finding it hard to explain why you wouldn’t cite this case often!
If anyone could help me out, it would be greatly appreciated!
Using Fluther
or
