If you have over 10 posts moderated in less than an hour, shouldn't you just get banned?
Asked by
sumul (
360
)
April 8th, 2008
You know, to make the moderators’ jobs a little easier.
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
11 Answers
Nope.. It should remain subjective.
Yep, as long as that person has the chance to contact the moderators at a later date to try to work things out—like if someone else was screwing around on their computer for example.
yes – and not only if it’s within an hour…anyone who repeatedly chooses language or content that needs to be moderated shouldn’t be allowed to post
Response moderated
I’m with JP on this one!
Wait, I’m usually with JP on anything he says!
That johnpowell guy just knows what’s up.
Response moderated
ahh.. you would think that individual would maybe realize what’s up. Then again…
If were talking about that 14 year old kid then yea. I wonder if he knows about Yahoo Answers?
In theory, yes. In practice, I’d like there to be some human oversight.
Well, 10 worthless posts in an hour isn’t adding any value. One or two well written answers/questions are far more valuable.
An auto-ban might not be fair, but schooling them isn’t wrong, either.
Answer this question 
