General Question

Ladymia69's avatar

Can anyone suggest some historically based movies/documentaries about Southern slave revolts?

Asked by Ladymia69 (6881points) March 5th, 2011

I have been reading about slave insurrections (successful and unsuccessful) and am eager to see documentaries or dramatizations about them.

I have seen Roots numerous times, so please don’t suggest that one.

Thanks!

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

9 Answers

boffin's avatar

Amastad

Not really a “Deep South” revolt but an historic one..
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/20842/Amistad-mutiny

Dan_DeColumna's avatar

Three different rebellions/rebels and the film portrayals of them:

Denmark Vesey originally Telemaque, (1767? – July 2, 1822) was an African American slave brought to the United States from the Caribbean of Coromantee background. After purchasing his freedom, he planned what would have been one of the largest slave rebellions in the United States. Denmark Vesey’s rebellion was the subject of the 1980s made-for-television drama, Denmark Vesey’s Revolt, in which his character was played by actor Yaphet Kotto. Vesey’s character also appeared in the 1991 TV movie Brother Future, in which he was played by the then-too young Carl Lumbly, who was 40 years old at the time.

Nathaniel “Nat” Turner (October 2, 1800 – November 11, 1831) was an American slave who led a slave rebellion in Virginia on August 21, 1831 that resulted in 56 white deaths and over 55 black deaths, the largest number of fatalities to occur in one uprising prior to the American Civil War in the southern United States. Nat Turner: A Troublesome Property, a film by Charles Burnett, was released in 2003.

John Brown (May 9, 1800 – December 2, 1859) was a revolutionary abolitionist from the United States, who led the Pottawatomie Massacre in 1856 in Bleeding Kansas and made his name in the unsuccessful raid at Harpers Ferry in 1859. The two most noted screen portrayals of Brown have both been given by actor Raymond Massey. The 1940 film Santa Fe Trail, starring Errol Flynn and Olivia de Havilland, depicted Brown completely unsympathetically as an out-and-out villainous madman, and Massey added to that impression by playing him with a constant, wild-eyed stare. The film gave the impression that it did not oppose African-American slavery, even to the point of having a black “mammy” character say, after an especially fierce battle, “Mr. Brown done promised us freedom, but… if this is freedom, I don’t want no part of it”. Massey portrayed Brown again in the little-known, low-budget Seven Angry Men, in which he was not only unquestionably the main character, but was depicted and acted in a much more restrained, sympathetic way. Brown was also portrayed on film by John Cromwell in the 1940 Abe Lincoln in Illinois. Cromwell was the director of the film and was not credited in the role. Oddly enough, Lincoln was played by Raymond Massey. Singer Johnny Cash portrayed John Brown in Book I, Episode Five of the 1985 TV miniseries North and South. He is revered by character Virgilia Hazard (Kirstie Alley). During the Harpers Ferry episode, he exchanges brief words with character Orry Main (Patrick Swayze) and appears noble in his aims, but unrealistic. Sterling Hayden also portrayed John Brown in the 1982 miniseries The Blue and the Gray.

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nat_Turner#In_popular_culture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denmark_Vesey#In_art
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brown_%28abolitionist%29#Visual_portrayals

12Oaks's avatar

If you’d like to see something that shows the other side of that to give you some balance on that, look at or read Gone With the Wind. They treated the slaves as friends, and even after they were freed, many, if not most, still stayed on the job because that is what they liked to do.

Fictional story, yes. So was Roots. But there are two sides to every issue.

Ladymia69's avatar

@12Oaks Seen Gone with the Wind.

“They treated the slaves as friends, and even after they were freed, many, if not most, still stayed on the job because that is what they liked to do.”

I think you are buying into the idealized, hopeful white vision of what life was like for slaves then.

Ladymia69's avatar

@Dan_DeColumna Funny you mentioned Denmark Vesey, the reason I asked this question was because at my job (library) I picked up a book about him, and started reading through it. It is fascinating.

12Oaks's avatar

@ladymia69 Actually, I was buying into the “look at both sides of any story” ideal. And, besides, I’m not buying into any white vision of anything, as I’ve also read Roots, which was also a fictional story as previously mentioned. Neither are true stories of anything, just fictional stories that were based in the same time period in or around the same place. Or, two sides to a similiar story. Gone With the Wind was better on so many fronts, as an aside.

Ladymia69's avatar

@12Oaks I apologize. When I was a kid watching Gone with the Wind with my parents, and saw Scarlett smacking Prissy around, I no longer liked her. I was worried for her, and while Scarlett went on in her narcissistic ramblings for the rest of the film, I barely payed attention because I was disgusted with how the servants were treated, and couldn’t get over it. I have always been obsessed with the underdog. And i don’t really know what you mean by there being “2 sides to every story”. Do you mean that some blacks didn’t mind being slaves??

If you are trying to convince me that slavery was not a cruel, sad, shameful part of Southern heritage, you shouldn’t waste your time.

12Oaks's avatar

@ladymia69 I never saw the fictional movie, I only read the fictional book, so the fictional stories could have varied. It may do you some good not to get worked up over fictional actors and fictional actresses fictionally acting in a fictional movie. That can’t be too healthy.

I’m not trying to convince anybody of anything, just simply stating that there are two sides to every story. Not unike the fictional Roots and the fictional Gone With the Wind, that were both made into fictional movies using actors and actresses portraying fictional characters. That’s all, and there’s nothing wrong with enjoying fictional stories.

Ladymia69's avatar

@12Oaks It is a fictional story, but it is based on the way life was in that time, no? And the depictions of treatment of slaves in that film were thoroughly whitewashed…the treatment of most slaves (with exceptions, of course) in real life were much worse. I have read several books on the subject.

You don’t think it’s a healthy reaction to be disgusted by injustice? Movies are made to spark emotions, voluntarily or involuntarily.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther