General Question

mitchbonevac's avatar

Which looks better for shirts. Printed or embroidered?

Asked by mitchbonevac (4points) January 26th, 2012

I would like to know which people prefer most. Whether printed tees or embroidered.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

9 Answers

wilma's avatar

I think embroidered looks classier.

elbanditoroso's avatar

It depends on the occasion and the place. Embroidered is definitely higher fashion, but if you are going to sweep the floor, a printed tshirt is just fine.

newtscamander's avatar

Embroidered looks more qualitative, but if you want, say your dog, on a t-shirt you would have to go for printed ;)

Skaggfacemutt's avatar

I always choose embroidered for sweatshirts, but I can’t say that I have ever seen an embroidered t-shirt. All of mine are printed.

newtscamander's avatar

Hollister or other brands always have their brand or logo embroidered..

Hain_roo's avatar

It depends on the size and nature of the graphic.

EverRose11's avatar

I like both seems to matter in what look your going for at any particular time and or event you wearing that articular shirt,

harple's avatar

Printing on a t-shirt, embroidered on a polo shirt. The polo shirt can cope better with the weight of the embroidery, and the weave of a polo shirt is less suited to printing.

augustlan's avatar

Embroidery looks nicer, but printed is more comfortable. A lot of embroidery is scratchy on the inside.

Answer this question




to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther