Social Question

ibstubro's avatar

Would you characterize the '90's TV show Baywatch as "beloved"?

Asked by ibstubro (18765points) January 4th, 2016

Is be-lusted perhaps more appropriate?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

9 Answers

ragingloli's avatar

no, it was shit

zenvelo's avatar

Be-gone is about all that can be said positive about it.

msh's avatar

I dunno. Chandler and Joey watching the show in their Laz-I-Boys for the slow-motion running scenes was funny to watch them watch. Other than those two… Uhm, no.

ucme's avatar

Be-crass

Earthbound_Misfit's avatar

Never watched it.

ibstubro's avatar

Well, I’m glad that it wasn’t only me that thought “beloved” was a bit of a stretch.

Although, like @Earthbound_Misfit, I never really watched the show, I saw parts and know the plot or lack thereof.
“Shit” and ”“crass” are terms I would likely use @ragingloli & @ucme.

But, it’s baaaaaack, @zenvelo. Maybe Kelly Rohrbach can release a little home porn as a teaser (so to speak).

“Friends” probably qualifies as “beloved”, @msh.

elbanditoroso's avatar

It pandered. It was a tease show. People in running around tight bathing suits. But never, ever a hint of real skin.

Utter waste of time.

It was beloved in the same sense that syphilis is beloved.

kritiper's avatar

“Be-lusted” is WAY more accurate!

Strauss's avatar

No more “crass” or “shit” as the original 1970’s version of Charlie’s Jiggles Angels!

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther