General Question

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

[NSFW] Men, if it were not for what the female vagina can do for your penis, would you truly have anything to do with it?

Asked by Hypocrisy_Central (26798points) January 18th, 2016

When it comes to female body parts, the vagina is not really aesthetically appealing; eyes, breast, hair, lips, and even feet are more appealing from a visual point of view. From an artistic stance (for lack of a better word) the vagina is generally much to look at. From what I can extrapolate over my years on this planet is that if it were not for what the vagina can do for the pleasure of a man, I would bet my donuts to anyone’s dollars normal men would not find the vagina appealing if it did nothing for them. I just know someone here as an opposing thought, so bring it, what do you think?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

113 Answers

Seek's avatar

Georgia O’Keefe doesn’t appear to have missed the aesthetic quality of the yoni.

ragingloli's avatar

have you ever even looked at your own balls?
putrid, goosepimpled, saggy, wrinkly, hairy abominations.

Coloma's avatar

Vaginas are might have come into existence to appeal to men for the reasons they do, but they were hardly designed to exist just so they could “do” something for the male of the species. They are also known as the…helloooo…“birth canal”, the exit from which a fetus escapes from the uterus at the time of birth. The real object of a vagina is to be the entry and exit for the human offspring not an amusement park for the male penis.

zenvelo's avatar

I find them absolutely fascinating and lovely to gaze upon. And much more than something to accommodate a penis, it is an almost mystical focus of power for the woman, and it allows me a place to please a woman.

kritiper's avatar

It’s not about the vagina, it’s what the vagina means inside the guy’s head. It’s the idea of where the penis is, the view or sensation of those lovely breasts in his eyes. It’s the idea of what it gonna feel like when he climaxes that brings it all together, not just “the vagina.” It’s so much more than that! Besides, that vagina thing is so soft and slippery that a guy really doesn’t feel that much, especially if he’s been holding that hard-on for any length of time. It starts to get numb!

Haleth's avatar

I’m pretty sure all of us were born at some point. Asking “what can the vagina do for me?” is pretty hilarious when each and every one of us came out of one.

Coloma's avatar

Vaginas are life giving forces, mystical indeed!

Cruiser's avatar

I think they are both beautiful and mysterious. When I see a woman for the first time that I am attracted to, I can see their faces, eyes, lips and have a pretty good idea what the shape and size of their breasts are, But there is only one way to ultimately know what a woman’s vagina looks like and they are all so different and IMO beautiful. There is a very unique symmetry to the vagina and like @Seek points out that Georgia O’Keefe has made beautiful art work with her renderings of the vagina in her paintings. I feel bad for anyone that does not embrace the beauty of that part of a woman’s body.

jaytkay's avatar

Asking “what can the vagina do for me?”

That was one of President Kennedy’s best speeches. Truly inspiring.

ARE_you_kidding_me's avatar

Yeah, 90% of my marriage is non-sexual. I still need a lady around regardless if we are screwing or not. As I get older I care about that less and less and it’s more about basic affection/companionship. I still take it when I can get it though.

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@Coloma Vaginas are might have come into existence to appeal to men for the reasons they do, but they were hardly designed to exist just so they could “do” something for the male of the species.
I could agree with you 100% on that but I don’t want you to have to reverse yourself in that thinking.

They are also known as the…helloooo…“birth canal”, the exit from which a fetus escapes from the uterus at the time of birth.
Again, I could have agreed again, but then again, you would have reason to reverse yourself. The only change I would make is that it is a baby that is birth, the fetus is just a stage of it, less anyone think merely ”tissue” only.

The real object of a vagina is to be the entry and exit for the human offspring not an amusement park for the male penis.
But that is not the prevailing ideology, less boinking only happens when someone actually wants to bring more humans into the world. But it is just as much amusement for males as for females regularly these days. If that was the dominant ideology the sale of dildos would drop through the cellar.

@zenvelo @Cruiser I find them absolutely fascinating and lovely to gaze upon. And much more than something to accommodate a penis, it is an almost mystical focus of power for the woman, and it allows me a place to please a woman.
I think they are both beautiful and mysterious.
Let me ask you both this, if women had them, but received no more or less pleasure of them than the knee or the heel, and there was no way to stick a penis into it, would you still find them as appealing?

@kritiper It’s not about the vagina, it’s what the vagina means inside the guy’s head. It’s the idea of where the penis is,..]
Well, you have the closest idea to the whole ideology of the vagina being what it is because of what males are socially or psychologically inclined to have an attraction to them and see them as a thing of beauty because of how it ”gets into a man’s head” (the big one, not the little one).

It’s the idea of what it gonna feel like when he climaxes that brings it all together, not just “the vagina.”
If this was achieved by rubbing fingers and not boinking would the vagina still be as desirable to normal men?

@ARE_you_kidding_me Yeah, 90% of my marriage is non-sexual. I still need a lady around regardless if we are screwing or not.
Honestly, how many men do you think adhere to that belief, especially those less than 30 years of age? How many do you believe would honestly have anything to do with women if there was zero to 5% chance at sex?

Mama_Cakes's avatar

To answer you question, they look like a sword gash, so you’re right, I wouldn’t find them all that appealing.

ARE_you_kidding_me's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central We (men) are hard-wired for this. We are happier when they are around provided they are not an abrasive, bitchy shrew. It’s biology

kritiper's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central On the second part of what you said above, you missed it. It’s a whole meal deal, everything I described. All you caught, on that second part of yours, was the crumbs.

Strauss's avatar

Artiste Judy Chicago has transformed it from anatomy to art!

Cruiser's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central I am trying hard to not judge or draw conclusions from both your opening question and your followup questions and it is getting harder not to the further you take this. That said I can honestly answer that if the vagina was not the pleasure center it actually is and responded no differently than a knee or heel as you suggest, I would most likely treat it as I do a knee or heel on my lady. Our skin is the largest organ in our body and is highly responsive to touch sensation. I have yet to meet a woman that did not enjoy a foot massage or the attention a gentle caress to their knee or any other spot on their body for that matter. I know for a fact a woman appreciates when attention is directed to other parts of their body besides their vagina or breasts. I also know a woman’s biggest pleasure center is between her ears and you can’t get to it from her vagina.

Coloma's avatar

@Cruiser here, here, well said, though some men can certainly have dicks for brains that are easily accessible from any point of their body. lol

cazzie's avatar

I know some men who also think like this, and, as @Haleth so aptly observed, never should have ever had anything to do with it, including their initial egress, because they clearly miss the point. @Haleth, Great Answer x 100.

ucme's avatar

My children first entered the world from one, remains the most beautiful sight these eyes will ever see.

Cruiser's avatar

^^^I think I just had a flashback

zenvelo's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central “Let me ask you both this, if women had them, but received no more or less pleasure of them than the knee or the heel, and there was no way to stick a penis into it, would you still find them as appealing?”

Yes, I would! Women I know enjoy the attention paid to their knees and heels. And visually, the vagina is still much more delightful to gaze upon.

stanleybmanly's avatar

Form follows function. From a design standpoint, it must be simpler to wire we men to be obsessed with female parts than it is to alter those parts for supposed aesthetic appeal. Personally, I’m grateful that the urge to mate doesn’t (usually) result in the death of we men as in a lot of other species. It’s obvious that we as men are driven to be obsessed with vaginas regardless of anything prudent or rational.

majorrich's avatar

Well, I do like tacos.. Wait a minute you pee out that thing! And it BLEEDS! (Runs away screaming) I guess the same can be said of male genitalia design.

Jak's avatar

Putrid. Hahahahaha! I’m trying to figure out why any woman would run after you trying to force you to interact with her vagina if there were no built-in biological reason. Toes don’t do much for me but no one tries to make me fondle them. You see what I mean? As @ragingloli points out, your own bits seem less than appealing and take some getting used to. Males in general, I mean, not you specifically.

ARE_you_kidding_me's avatar

can’t trust it though.

dappled_leaves's avatar

@majorrich “Wait a minute you pee out that thing! ”

No. Nope. Not even. Back to anatomy class with you.

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@kritiper On the second part of what you said above, you missed it. It’s a whole meal deal, everything I described. All you caught, on that second part of yours, was the crumbs.
No, I did not. The point being if men say the vagina with no greater appeal than a pinky it would not be a part of the meal to even have a crumb.

@Cruiser Our skin is the larges organ in our body and is highly responsive to touch sensation. I have yet to meet a woman that did not enjoy a foot massage or the attention a gentle caress to their knee or any other spot on their body for that matter. I know for a fact a woman appreciates when attention is directed to other parts of their body besides their vagina or breasts.
Do I take it you are going on record to say that all parts of the female body that they receive pleasure from having it touched or massage you see in the same light of desire if you never got a personal orgasm from it?

I also know a woman’s biggest pleasure center is between her ears and you can’t get to it from their from her vagina.
And that has what to do with a man’s ejaculation?

@zenvelo Yes, I would! Women I know enjoy the attention paid to their knees and heels. And visually, the vagina is still much more delightful to gaze upon.
You see it as equal in appeal as the small of the knee, the angle, small of the back, or nape of the neck? Well, do those aforementioned parts give you an errection as much as the vigina, and of so why do you believe they don’t?

Jak's avatar

P.S. Exactly how do you define “normal man”?

AdventureElephants's avatar

The Great Wall of Vagina certainly draws a crowd, none of whom seem to be there for the purposes of sticking their penises into anything…

Cruiser's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central I said earlier “I am trying hard to not judge or draw conclusions from both your opening question and your followup questions and it is getting harder not to the further you take this. ” and I can no longer resist drawing conclusions that you are either so clueless as far as women are concerned or you are busting my chops. Not the first time either.

But to answer your question….I will go on record and say I know first hand that a woman will experience pleasure when touched affectionately and attentively no matter where you touch them. And I also know that I will have zero chance of the enjoyment of a climax if I do not stimulate my woman mentally and spiritually.

zenvelo's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central You posed a question with a condition: _ but received no more or less pleasure of them than the knee or the heel, and there was no way to stick a penis into it, would you still find them as appealing_ to which I replied “Yes I would.”

And now you wonder if other parts of a woman excite me, to which I again say yes. But you seem to find a woman as attractive as a fleshlight.

kritiper's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central Again you focus on only the vagina, from a man’s point of view supposedly, instead of the whole experience that the man is experiencing. It’s about more than just the vagina! Sure, it’s the basic aim, just not the only aim.

RedDeerGuy1's avatar

I don’t understand your question. It’s not like I’m going to play cards with it. No one plays with my feet and it doesn’t bother me.

Seek's avatar

The only people I know that actively revile the appearance of the yoni are gay men. And that’s more confusion than anything else.

janbb's avatar

@Seek Well, there seems to be at least one straight man who does.

Seek's avatar

Also, can’t help myself,

what the female vagina can do

As opposed to the male vagina?

janbb's avatar

Why do I suddenly feel like posting the picture of Rosie the Riveter? Should it be renamed “Rosie the Vagina”?

Seek's avatar

I’d rivet her Rosie… Heh heh… ::belch::

rojo's avatar

Looking into this topic, so to speak, led me to another word for the female genitalia which led in turn to Wikipedia that offered me this little titbit of information:

The word appears several times in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales (c. 1390), in bawdy contexts, but it does not appear to be considered obscene at this point, since it is used openly.[20] A notable use is from the “Miller’s Tale”: “Pryvely he caught her by the queynte.” The Wife of Bath also uses this term, “For certeyn, olde dotard, by your leave/You shall have queynte right enough at eve… What aileth you to grouche thus and groan?/Is it for ye would have my queynte alone?” In modernised versions of these passages the word “queynte” is usually translated simply as “cunt”.[21][22] However, in Chaucer’s usage there seems to be an overlap between the words “cunt” and “quaint” (possibly derived from the Latin for “known”). “Quaint” was probably pronounced in Middle English in much the same way as “cunt”. It is sometimes unclear whether the two words were thought of as distinct from one another. Elsewhere in Chaucer’s work the word queynte seems to be used with meaning comparable to the modern “quaint” (curious or old-fashioned, but nevertheless appealing).

I thought the juxtaposition of the words cunt and quaint, along with the given meaning “curious or old fashioned, but nevertheless appealing” rather apropos to this discussion.

Seek's avatar

“Cunt” derives from, I believe, the Germanic word for “dagger sheath”.

Strauss's avatar

So…he plunges plungeth his dagger into her sheath…?

Seek's avatar

Naturally. Haven’t you ever read a Harlequin novel?

rojo's avatar

From this article

It is believed that the word ‘Cunt’ came from the Proto German word ‘Kunto’ which is said to have come from the Indo-European word ‘Kunti’ which is the name of a much respected and revered Hindu goddess who was also known as ‘Cunti-Devi’ and is said to be the ruler of ‘Kunta’ which we know as ‘Kundalini’ energy. The snake like feminine energy that travels up our spine. Legend stories say how she sang to the gods to call them to sleep with her. She eventually had a son with the Sun God, Surya and ‘The Teachings of Queen Kunti’ can still be read today. Many say that ‘Cunt’ derived from the Oriental Great Goddess Cunti, also known in ancient Hinduism as the ‘Yoni of the Universe’ (yoni means ‘sacred temple’ in Sanskrit and is used to describe the womb and cunt). Also Indian children who were born out of wedlock were know as ‘Kuntas’ and revered as gifts of the Goddess Kunti’. The word ‘Kunda’ is also used in India for a hole or pit in the ground (agni-kunda, fire-pit) for storing fire on alters in the Vedic religion.”

rojo's avatar

Hey There Vagina (parody of another once-popular song).

I think this song pretty much states the OP’s original supposition.

janbb's avatar

@rojo That’s funny!

ucme's avatar

Just for the record, my balls are beautiful too :D

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@Cruiser But to answer your question….I will go on record and say I know first hand that a woman will experience pleasure when touched affectionately and attentively no matter where you touch them. And I also know that I will have zero chance of the enjoyment of a climax if I do not stimulate my woman mentally and spiritually.
So, for you (and I am not assuming for all men), that you would be quite happy with the ”whole woman experience” even if you never reached an orgasm vaginally? If that was or should be enough, how do you factor so many men who end marriages, dump girlfriends, or be unfaithful when they can’t reach climax vaginally (or at least have the fun of trying)? Even if she always had a ”headache” simply giving her pleasure massaging her neck or feet should be enough, right? @kritiper feel free to jump in on this……

@Jak P.S. Exactly how do you define “normal man”?
If we use nature in place of Divine assigned, it is a man with a healthy libido that loves vaginal sex (to put it mildly).

Cruiser's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central I have been with my wife over 24 years now and if the only sexual pleasure I got with my wife was vaginally, my sex life would be less than fulfilling. The love, comfort and pleasure I experience with being with my wife is so much more than just vaginal sex and if you do not understand and appreciate this concept by now, you probably never will.

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

^ I have been with my wife over 24 years now and if the only sexual pleasure I got with my wife was vaginally, my sex life would be less than fulfilling.
My last comment to you on the subject before I will just conclude we are not on the same page. If those past 25 years you were with your wife and you could or never had vaginal sex with her and she did not give up the ’poop chute”, would your sexual experience with her been as fulfilling as you remember it now? I do not think it is a far stretch to know if not image, some men (from the evidence I have seen I will say many) would be done with the relationship if they went six months and no boinking.

Seek's avatar

Flag on the play: shifting goalposts.

The question was whether one could find appeal in the vagina outside its physical effects on the phallus, not whether one’s sex life would be unfulfilled without occasional penetrative sex.

At least try to stay on your own topic.

Coloma's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central Are you one of those men that would abandon your wife in the event her sex drive plummeted, she became ill or disabled and unable to have sex or, when she is years past menopause and no longer very interested? What would Jesus say about that? lol

rojo's avatar

@Seek Seriously? It looked a lot more like a Roughing the Snapper penalty to me.

Seek's avatar

snapper? I thought the colloquial piscean term was “tuna”.

majorrich's avatar

^^^ Snort! We were fortunate enough for our drives to plummet dramatically due to old age at approximately the same time. Although for about 10 years my wife had to suffer my equipment failures due to illness. Now she’s apt to burst into flames at any given moment so I installed zone heating so she can go to islands of cool when she has her power surges.

Cruiser's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central It is taking me a lot of patience to answer this but since you said this is your last comment to me I will take you at your word and leave you with my answer…yes.

I did not fall in love with my wife because of vaginal sex, I did not marry my wife because of vaginal sex and after over 24 years together and all the choppy waters we have had to navigate raising a family together we did not get through it all because of vaginal sex. If we never had vaginal sex ever again I believe in my heart we will be together till death do us part.

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@Seek Flag on the play: shifting goalposts.
The question was whether one could find appeal in the vagina outside its physical effects on the phallus, not whether one’s sex life would be unfulfilled without occasional penetrative sex.
At least try to stay on your own topic.
As always I try to stay on the topic, but others do illegal shifts. The question was not predicated in one iota if women got pleasure from it, liked their toes sucked, their neck rubbed or their ankles massaged. The question was straight forward, ”if you could not stick your dumbstick in it, would the vagina be as appealing to you?” What relationship a person had or did not have because of it I didn’t care. If one can be just as excited over a woman’s knee and pop a woody because of it, more power to them. I always try to stay on point but others try to hat dance around it like Gregory Hines because they refuse to accept a logical truth much less acknowledges it. In general I can bet my dollars to anyone’s donuts that if had 20 couples and the woman never gave it up, more than 50% of those men would leave or cheat within 18 months (and that is being very generous).

@Coloma Are you one of those men that would abandon your wife in the event her sex drive plummeted, she became ill or disabled and unable to have sex or, when she is years past menopause and no longer very interested?
No…..when she is long past menopause I won’t know it, I will be dead by then.

What would Jesus say about that? Lol
The same as He tells me, my body is partly owned by my wife as hers is mine. If I come home tired after moving a house of furniture and I am tire, I best put some jet fuel in the tank if she is on the tarmac. Physical illness that literally leaves one unable even if willing is an exception, but merely feeling tired or wanting to do something else is no out; it isn’t with most other aspects of marriage is it?

AdventureElephants's avatar

It was not 10 years ago that prostate cancer terrified men because they would lose the ability to maintain erections. I dare say they did not all also lose the ability to find comfort in a vagina, despite a lack of penetration.

Coloma's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central Sooo…you’re looking for a child bride that won’t reach menopause until you’ve been dead for 30 years and you don’t care if your wife is really not feeling consensual as long as you get some? Bullshit..nobodies body “belongs” to another and wanting a women to perform/service you on command like a trained seal to meet your selfish needs is, quite frankly, abusive. Feeling tired or wanting to do something else IS her right, you know, to honor herself first not be a weenie worshiping slave.

What if SHE comes home tired, are you going to run her a bubble bath and pour her a glass of wine and let her unwind without wagging your weenie in her face?

Gah…I can’t take this nonsense anymore.

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@Coloma _[.. you don’t care if your wife is really not feeling consensual as long as you get some? _
To divert for a moment, it would be consensual, but you have no real capacity to understand it. The way in which household of believers work and the rest of everything else is as different as night and day. Sex is like any other thing in the marriage, does one say to their spouse sorry I can’t help you do blank, which they are fully capable of doing just because it doesn’t interest them or they are too tired to be bothered? People do things for their spouse on many occasions when they personally have no interest in it or are tired.

Bullshit..nobodies body “belongs” to another and wanting a women to perform/service you on command like a trained seal to meet your selfish needs is, quite frankly, abusive.
To address the 1st part of that, it is why you cannot fathom a Believer’s relationship, because in reality the relationship you are champion is the selfish relationship. I guess people are getting bent for no reason if that were the case. If their spouse is sleeping around with other people I guess they should just accept they done have any stake in them really as their spouse has no stake in them. To the second misconception, in a relationship you do for your spouse even when tired. If you worked all day but your wife ask for a back massage, you suck it up, and do it. Are you a slave or trained seal they you honor their request when you might not be in the mood to? You make the sacrifice to honor their request out of your love for them. To say I am tired, I don’t care what they want; that is a selfish relationship…..but, that is the trick some are duped into believing.

What if SHE comes home tired, are you going to run her a bubble bath and pour her a glass of wine and let her unwind without wagging your weenie in her face?
You bet, I would even have her a bite to eat, wash her hair, there will be scented candles about the bath, and that would happen even on days I did not have an urge to have my dumbstick serviced, that is what you do when you truly are looking out for your spouse, you go the extra mile without complaining about how many extra steps you have to take.

cazzie's avatar

@Seek I’ve cracked it; the reason he said ‘female vagina’ and then he said ‘it’. He wasn’t referring to the vagina when he said ‘it’. It was the word ‘female’. Makes much more sense when you read it like that. So, what he was really saying was, Men, if it were not for what the vagina can do for your penis, would you truly have anything to do with the female?

rojo's avatar

@cazzie for further confirmation of your theory, listen to the song I linked to above

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@cazzie I’ve cracked it; the reason he said ‘female vagina’ and then he said ‘it’. He wasn’t referring to the vagina when he said ‘it’. It was the word ‘female’. Makes much more sense when you read it like that.
No….you have not cracked ”it”, with it being comments and questions of mine because you have your predisposed assumptions to what is actually being said but try to manufacture facts to support it. If I meant women, I would have said women. The reason I did not say women, hold on to your hat Wilma Flintstone. There are other things a woman can do if she cannot have sex vaginally, though some would say they are more degrading to women then simply having sex with your husband when you are tire, or your mind is on something else. Surely I believe you think no man has ever had sex with his wife because she desired it, or performed certain aspects of sex he was not thrilled about. Some women take those roads more adventurous even when vaginal sex is quite easy to do, and if she does, she can still get a man’s motor running even if her sugar walls was as welcoming as a salt mine.

Seek's avatar

I think I’m going to throw up.

cazzie's avatar

I think he called me Wilma. At least he didn’t call me a Betty. I’ve been married twice for a total of 17 years. I’m going to safely bet on who among us lives in the stone age.

cazzie's avatar

And I always love how he proves exactly my point when he is trying to dispute it. Or perhaps I don’t…. It is sort of like fencing with an opponent with no foil… except for the stuff on his head.

zenvelo's avatar

@cazzie Demonstrating the accuracy of statements on this thread, Wilma Flintstone didn’t wear a hat.

cazzie's avatar

I’m holding my foil, not wearing it. En garde.

janbb's avatar

Ask not what the vagina can do for you, ask what you can do for the vagina.

rojo's avatar

“Men are from vaginas, and women are from women.”
Jarod Kintz

rojo's avatar

A joke that illustrates what @Seek and @cazzie are talking about

A son asks his father “Dad, whats the difference between a vagina and a cunt ?”

“Look at this,” says the dad, as he lifts the sheets and shows his son his naked sleeping mother, and pointing to her crotch he says “That son is a vagina.”

“Its looks wonderful dad, can I touch it?” asks the son.

“NO son,” says dad, “If you touch the vagina you’ll wake the cunt!”

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@cazzie _ I think he called me Wilma._
I would NEVER compare you to Wilma Flintstone….and I will politely leave it at that..

I’ve been married twice for a total of 17 years.
(Don’t bite, don’t bite….it ain’t worth it….but it would be juicy)

And I always love how he proves exactly my point when he is trying to dispute it. Or perhaps I don’t….
Perhaps that is your problem; never bring a blade to a gunfight.

Yeah, so I guess all those guys who left their wives and G/F or cheated on them because she always had a ”headache” left not because they could not ejaculate in her, she must have been too lazy to go make them a sandwich when they asked so they would not miss a play during the game, or she starched their shirts too much, or she never had the house clean. If they had only done those things and more their man would never have left or cheated on them because they never spread their legs. ~~

@rojo And I waited for it, I thought surely he was going to say a vagina was on your mother but the tart you simply boink had a cunt.

Seek's avatar

Gee, why aren’t you married again?

Cruiser's avatar

HC…time to give it a rest…you are starting to scare the children and even the grandparents. Point taken all across the board. Put a fork in it pretty please.

janbb's avatar

^^Agree

jca's avatar

@janbb‘s quote “Ask not what the vagina can do for you” should win Quote of the Year. A thousand GA’s.

kritiper's avatar

If it was all just about the vagina, men might want to hook up with women for just T and A. But what so special about that if there is no climactic thrill in and of the man’s groin? If women couldn’t offer anything else, men wouldn’t have anything to do with them.

Coloma's avatar

@janbb Hah! I was going to post “ask not…” as well but you beat me to it.

cazzie's avatar

We need a question now along the lines of, [NSFW] Ladies, if it were not for what the male penis can do for your vagina, would you truly have anything to do with it? (I would never even think to ask such a ridiculous question.)

janbb's avatar

@cazzie Actually, I was considering asking just that after all this nonsense.

Seek's avatar

Can the penis reach things on high shelves and open jars?

janbb's avatar

Can it shovel snow?

janbb's avatar

And then there’s Penis Envy. A great song!

cazzie's avatar

And that joke…. about waking the cunt, how about this? A daughter asks her mother “Mum, whats the difference between a penis and a dick ?”
“Look at this,” says the mom, as she lifts the sheets and shows her daughter her naked sleeping father, and pointing to his crotch she says “That, sweetie, is a penis.”
“Its looks wonderful, Mom, can I touch it?” asks the daughter.
“NO, dear,” says mum, “If you touch the penis you’ll wake the dick!”

Coloma's avatar

A dick by any other name is still a dick.

janbb's avatar

^ Unless it’s small and then it’s a dicklet.

Coloma's avatar

A micro dick? lol

zenvelo's avatar

@janbb now now, don’t be calling anyone a hypodick.

Cruiser's avatar

@zenvelo With the advent of new carbon based technology we can now use the term nano-dick

Coloma's avatar

Here everyone sing along now….

www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeFCZ8n6MVU

Seek's avatar

And for follow-up….

Coloma's avatar

^^^ Hah…perfect! I forgot all about that C.B. song. lol

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@Cruiser HC…time to give it a rest…you are starting to scare the children and even the grandparents.
The fork has been in this a while back, some still haven’t realized the goose is cooked and the burnt smell is not the spices. Facts are facts, you can say pigs can fly and launch them out of a cannon, but that is not true flight. I would have to say one of the more logical and honest answers was from @kritiper a few posts up…..the rest…. Folie à Deux at best.

cazzie's avatar

(Don’t bite, don’t bite….it ain’t worth it….but it would be juicy) Oh, please, share what went through your mind when I shared that small personal detail of my life.

Seek's avatar

Obviously, cazzie, if you had been a good, submissive, Christian blow-up-doll you might have not been smart enough to make your own decision to end those marriages.

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

I think @zenvelo and others alike express my thoughts on this better than I.

As to the etymology of the word cunt and it’s usage in English, I believe it first migrated to English from the German via mariners. For ages there has been an excellent rope splicing technique formerly called the “cunt splice” made with the “cunt knot” or the “cunny.” That was back in the days of hemp. The kind used in lines and halyards aboard sailing ships. Here is a cunt splice. It doesn’t take a very imaginative sailor to see why. But, in these days of political correctness, it is now called a cut splice. As it is precisely the same knot and there are no cuts involved in making this splice, it makes no sense to call it that. It does however contribute to the increasingly non-nonsensical which ultimately alienates us from our past.

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

^^ Obviously, cazzie, if you had been a good, submissive, Christian blow-up-doll you might have not been smart enough to make your own decision to end those marriages.
Oh, wow, I know the secret now, tell all woman to be an obstinate, secular female Chucky doll with the attitude of a barracuda you will be smart enough to one-side yourself out of a union….wait, they have no better success (maybe less) than the alleged blowup-doll (aka supportive woman to those with esteem problems), go figure. ~~~

cazzie's avatar

Oh oh oh! Now I’m an obstinate, secular (ooohhh what a pejorative) Chucky doll-barracuda! That’s awesome! Because of course it couldn’t have been the man’s doing….

Espiritus_Corvus's avatar

If you look on the eastern seaboard radar right now, you will see a HUGE FRIGID VAGINA about to engulf most of the east coast of the U.S.

Cruiser's avatar

@Hypocrisy_Central The proverbial goose is indeed overdone…Just having some dessert is all. Can I offer you some Redi Whip? ;)

Seek's avatar

Chucky had a happy, mutually supportive secular marriage. Just saying.

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@Cruiser The proverbial goose is indeed overdone…Just having some dessert is all. Can I offer you some Redi Whip? ;)
Please, give my portion to some of the females, they seem to be steaming under the collar. I would love to tell them the reason most men want to be with them is because of their stunning personalities that can cause a man to cream his boxers…but heck….if they wait long enough they will see the short guy yell, ”The plane, the plane!”. :-D

ARE_you_kidding_me's avatar

If it was just about the vagina then apple would probably have made some fancy artificial pussy.

cazzie's avatar

Yes. I think by now HC deserves a big helping of crow and not goose.

ragingloli's avatar

Someone invent a time machine, so he can be sent back to his own time, 5000 bce

Cruiser's avatar

Plenty of Redi Whip for everybody @Hypocrisy_Central only you will have to bend down so Tatoo can give you a swirl on top of your head.

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

^ [...only you will have to bend down so Tatoo can give you a swirl on top of your head.
No thanks, if I take another step around this thread I may get something on my shoe i would have to scrape off, so much redacted left by so many even hip waders might not help. ;-)

janbb's avatar

Oh c’mon, HC – you throw out a misogynistic, nasty flamebait question and then get all prissy about the responses you’ve gotten. Stop being such a jackass. It’s clear you hate women and I suspect even hate “boinking” them or doing “the vertical tango.”

dammitjanetfromvegas's avatar

I respect @Hypocrisy_Central for NEVER personally attacking anyone here or calling them names.

cazzie's avatar

@dammitjanetfromvegas I guess you didn’t read his responses very closely.

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

@janbb Oh c’mon, HC – you throw out a misogynistic, nasty flamebait question and then get all prissy about the responses you’ve gotten.
It is only flame-bait to anyine who doesn’t want to admit the truth in it. Sure, some men will get all hot and excited over a woman’s knee or her sparkling personality and be with the until the end of time just for that if they never got an orgasm by way of her sugar walls, but thinking that apply with all men, Folie à Deux.

Stop being such a jackass.
Oh, I could say if I was a jackass it was because others were something else worse first. However, I think it is just a judgment made by those who have been flanked and have no recourse to react to it.

It’s clear you hate women and I suspect even hate “boinking” them or doing “the vertical tango.”
Er….that would make me gay, I am not gay, certainly not still be living anyhow. I do not hate women; it seems women hate being women because they think being women they are being short changed somehow.

@cazzie I guess you didn’t read his responses very closely
Oh, please, point some out, I would say I relish the thought of dishing out some humble pie, but it would truly just be sad to have to do it.

dammitjanetfromvegas's avatar

@cazzie I guess I didn’t. I do read his responses and I’ve never seen him personally attack anyone, yet he’s constantly bullied and called names, so…

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther