General Question

La_chica_gomela's avatar

What's the best way to indicate in writing that someone is a lawyer?

Asked by La_chica_gomela (12574points) September 18th, 2009

I’m talking about a formal document, such as a program the person is to speak at, a resume, or booklet listing donors to a charity.

I know you can write “John Smith, Esq.” or “Jane Smith, Esquire” (Wait, do you write “Esquire” for women, too?) But that sounds kind of pretentious, doesn’t it? Or does it? And I know that a law degree is a JD, so it seems like you could write, “Kerry King, JD”, but that sounds weird to me, is it weird?

There’s also “Attorney at Law”. It smacks of like ambulance-chasers to me. What’s your take?

There’s no one person in question, I’m just asking for general reference.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

7 Answers

peedub's avatar

Including ‘Esq.’ is not pretentious and is perfectly acceptable or appropriate.
I think I know what you mean, though. The fact that some attorneys use it, while others do not, probably makes the matter somewhat confusing. I will say, however, as a law student, it is not pretentious.
“The form of address Esq. is not used in the first person. It is used only when the reference is in the third person, such as addressing an envelope, making a formal introduction, or on business letterhead. Esq. is never used with any prenominal form of address, such as Dr., Mr., or Ms.. Thus, John Smith, Esq. or Mr. John Smith would be correct, but Mr. John Smith, Esq. would be incorrect.”

rooeytoo's avatar

Esquire is the accepted method, but you made me curious when you asked if it was appropriate for women as well. I checked the online dictionary and it says yes, good for women as well.

I would stick with that.

mammal's avatar

By sounding pompous, clinically detatched, and snidely threatening?

La_chica_gomela's avatar

@mammal: I meant if I’m writing about someone else. I thought that was obvious by now!~

Zaku's avatar

I don’t know what the “best” way is, but I suppose that judgement depends on the audience, and why they are indicating their lawyer status, and what specifically they are indicating. For example, particular education degrees, the fact they are legally representing someone in a case, or are retained by someone, or that they have passed certain bar exams, or they practice in a certain area, or whatever.

I don’t see that “esquire” has anything to do with law. (Here’s one definition of ‘esquire’.) (My guess is many Americans have no idea what “esquire” means, and I suppose many of those think it’s just some weird invented “holier than most” proclamation.)

The_Compassionate_Heretic's avatar

“Attorney” is an acceptable title.

Rozee's avatar

Now, that seems like something they would include in the education program. I oversee a paralegal program with about 60 lawyers. As academics, for the most part they use their first and last names and JD. I don’t know how they identify themselves otherwise.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther