General Question

nzigler's avatar

Calculating calories- calling all health and science jellies...

Asked by nzigler (1328points) November 30th, 2009

Please read the question as I’m not asking how many calories are in certain foods or anything like that. Here’s my concern:

My understanding is, that the main components of food are: carbohydrates, protein, and fat. That said, I also understand that 1 gram of carbohydrates = 4 calories, 1 gram of protein = 4 calories, and 1 gram of fat = 9 calories.

That being the case, if you know a donut has 35 grams of carbohydrates, 1 gram of protein, and 10 grams of fat you can say (with relative accuracy) that the donut in question amounts to approximately 234 calories. Often this formula gives you the exact number of calories that the food’s packaging states.

Here’s the deal though- many foods deviate from this formula slightly to moderately. Meaning- if you simply use the formula I just laid out, you sometimes get a slightly different number of calories than the food packaging might list. Sometimes this number is as much as 5 or even 10% off- statistically, that’s significant.

My guess is that there is a reason for this. e.g. You deduct calories for fiber or something the food has. So, the question really is, why the discrepancy and how do you really, scientifically, calculate the calories in food once you know its components and their proportions?

Bonus question: Alcohol (beer, wine, etc.) has calories but this formula fails miserably to calculate them as they have some carbohydrates but virtually no protein or fat. Is this because the alcohol turns to sugar as we metabolize it? Is there a formula for understanding the calories in alcoholic drinks?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

7 Answers

dpworkin's avatar

I think to remain accurate you need a calorimeter for each sample and a large enough number of samples to have statistical significance. Too many variables to trust a formula. Conditions are never that perfect.

nzigler's avatar

Well, what about a can of soda? Wouldn’t the contents be essentially identical in composition and volume each time?

dpworkin's avatar

I don’t know. Sometimes you get a piece of illegal alien in there.

Garebo's avatar

I find a more effective diet doesn’t require tallying calories for everything you ingest. I found it very hard to stick with that approach-at least that’s my experience-keep it simple s…. I like the handful or billfold volume analogies for quantities to consume. This being dictated by your basal metabolic rate, weight, height, sex and age. It worked for me, I lost 40 pounds and it has stayed off for three years now.
And yes I drank lots of lite beer during the weight loss-believe it or not. But everybody’s body is different.

RedPowerLady's avatar

I have a book called the GL diet (not GI). It explains this phenomenon. Perhaps check it out at the library.

Book

grumpyfish's avatar

Just to chime in on the alcohol thing: 100% ethanol has about the same number of calories as fat—9 per gram.

But yes—as @pdworkin said you need to use a calorimeter to work out the number of calories in something =)

Garebo's avatar

Well keep up the good work grumpyfish-I guess I need Pd’s calorimeter.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther