Social Question

mattbrowne's avatar

Suppose the next global influenza is a real killer - Should we deploy mosquitoes to distribute the vaccine more efficiently?

Asked by mattbrowne (31729points) March 22nd, 2010

From http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/03/researchers-turn-mosquitoes-into.html

Researchers Turn Mosquitoes Into Flying Vaccinators

Here’s a study to file under “unworkable but very cool.” A group of Japanese researchers has developed a mosquito that spreads vaccine instead of disease. Even the researchers admit, however, that regulatory and ethical problems will prevent the critters from ever taking wing—at least for the delivery of human vaccines. Scientists have dreamed up various ways to tinker with insects’ DNA to fight disease. One option is to create strains of mosquitoes that are resistant to infections with parasites or viruses, or that are unable to pass the pathogens on to humans. These would somehow have to replace the natural, disease-bearing mosquitoes, which is a tall order. Another strategy closer to becoming reality is to release transgenic mosquitoes that, when they mate with wild-type counterparts, don’t produce viable offspring. That would shrink the population over time.

The new study relies on a very different mechanism: Use mosquitoes to become what the scientists call “flying vaccinators.” Normally, when mosquitoes bite, they inject a tiny drop of saliva that prevents the host’s blood from clotting. The Japanese group decided to add an antigen-a compound that triggers an immune response-to the mix of proteins in the insect’s saliva. A group by led by molecular geneticist Shigeto Yoshida of Jichi Medical University in Tochigi, Japan, identified a region in the genome of Anopheles stephensi-a malaria mosquito-called a promoter that turns on genes only in the insects’ saliva. To this promoter they attached SP15, a candidate vaccine against leishmaniasis, a parasitic disease spread by sand flies that can cause skin sores and organ damage. Sure enough, the mosquitoes produced SP15 in their saliva, the team reports in the current issue of Insect Molecular Biology. And when the insects were allowed to feast on mice, the mice developed antibodies against SP15.

Antibody levels weren’t very high, and the team has yet to test whether they protect the rodents against the disease. (Only very few labs have the facilities for so-called challenge studies with that disease, says Yoshida.) In the experiment, mice were bitten some 1500 times on average; that may seem very high, but studies show that in places where malaria is rampant, people get bitten more than 100 times a night, Yoshida points out. In the meantime, the group has also made mosquitoes produce a candidate malaria vaccine. Other researchers are wowed by the achievement. “The science is really beautiful,” says Jesus Valenzuela of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Maryland, who developed the SP15 vaccine. David O’Brochta, an insect molecular geneticist at the University of Maryland, College Park, calls it “a fascinating proof of concept.”

So why won’t it fly? There’s a huge variation in the number of mosquito bites one person received compared with the next, so people exposed to the transgenic mosquitoes would get vastly different doses of the vaccine; it would be a bit like giving some people one measles jab and others 500 of them. No regulatory agency would sign off on that, says molecular biologist Robert Sinden of Imperial College London. Releasing the mosquitoes would also mean vaccinating people without their informed consent, an ethical no-no. Yoshida concedes that the mosquito would be “unacceptable” as a human vaccine-delivery mechanism. However, flying vaccinators-or “flying syringes” as some have dubbed them -may have potential in fighting animal disease, says O’Brochta. Animals don’t need to give their consent, and the variable dosage would be less of a concern.

Any thoughts?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

12 Answers

ragingloli's avatar

I do not like it, for the listed reasons. Also, there is no guarantee that the little buggers do not pick up other diseases before they sting the next person.
Also I hate being stung by insects.

cazzie's avatar

File this one under the ‘What could possibly go wrong?’ premise for a sci fi movie.

lillycoyote's avatar

Matt, you should so know better than this, really. I’m surprised. There are so many “unforeseen consequences” here of what-really-seemed-like-a-it-might-have-been-a-good-idea-at-the-the-time, that I cannot believe you are even pondering it. O.K, I take that back. I was a little rash. You’re putting an idea out there very often is really only about making us think, so… Let’s see, what is so troublesome about this one… 1. “Scientists have dreamed…” Scientists can dream all they want, but I would prefer if they don’t let it effect their work. 2. “These would somehow” , “These would somehow,” coming from scientists, not a phrase that instills a whole lot of confidence in me. 3. ”...the team has yet to test…” again, not making me feel all that good about the whole process. 4. “Other researchers are wowed”... sounds much too emotional a response for scientists I want to trust with messing with any species’ DNA :), 5. “People exposed to transgenic DNA would get vastly different doses of vaccine.” Science anyone? How are we to to analyse the results of any epidemiological study, any study at all, should these “flying vaccinators” be permitted to be unleashed, if we have no idea how much “vaccine” they are delivering? It’s just bad science. and 6. “Ethical no-no.” Oops! Sorry! We apologize, really, we do, we are so very sorry for having introduced an untested, possibly-dangerous-but-who-the-hell-knows-we-sure-don’t genetically engineered substance into your body.

Why won’t this fly? Other than the above mentioned, i’m all for it.

P.S. It’s a little late here and I can’t sleep so I am fluthering. I probably should have proofread my response more, but I didn’t. I hope you can get the gist of it though.

j0ey's avatar

Sounds like the Japanese have too much time on their hands.

What are they going to do next? Train monkeys to deliver pap smears?...yes i know this is gross

Cruiser's avatar

It will never fly here as the Government would have to figure a way to tax the mosquito bite to cover the cost of having the bug bite vaccination and Congressman Boehner would jump up and voice his objection to any Government run vaccination program “HELL NO”!

janbb's avatar

“O.K., Dr. Strangelove, It’s time to release the mosquitos!

Jayy's avatar

everybody has aids aids aids…

mattbrowne's avatar

@lillycoyote – Come on, this is food for thought. Suppose in 2012 the situation is like in late 1918. New infections and death rates are getting out of hand. The vaccination teams can’t keep up with ever increasing waiting lists and people lining up for miles and miles. Politicians are getting desperate. They tell people who are opposed to getting the vaccine to use insect repellents. Let’s contemplate this scenario. What will happen next?

cazzie's avatar

@cruiser it would never work over there because the company that came up with the vaccination would hold the country to ransom for billions of dollars and the drug company would end up owning the first born of the next generation to experiment and perform it’s drug trials on.

Cruiser's avatar

@cazzie I forgot about that important part! lol!

casheroo's avatar

Ugh. I get eaten alive whenever I walk outside. I’d be getting a mega dose!

Jeruba's avatar

I notice that the last post on this thread was almost exactly ten years ago. How strange to see it pop up like this now.

@mattbrowne was a great contributor, and I still miss him.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther