Social Question

phaedryx's avatar

Would better monitoring/tracking improve soccer?

Asked by phaedryx (6129points) June 18th, 2010

After I watched the goal that the US team scored today taken away by a ridiculously bad call, I started thinking. We have the technology to monitor the exact position of every player on the field (almost completely accurate off-sides calls). We could put enough cameras around the field that we would know which players actually got knocked down and which ones weren’t even touched (faking it). We could get an instant replay of important goals (like the one today).

On the other hand, my favorite sport is Ultimate, which doesn’t even have referees at all, which is part of its appeal. I can see how people could prefer not introducing more technology into the game.

What do you think, would it improve the game, hurt the game, or just be different, but no better or worse?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

7 Answers

lanahopple's avatar

I mean it defiantly would help, but i dont think a referee would be able to change her/his call even if they had an instant re play. Also, the fun about soccer is that you fight with the opposing teams, and if all the calls were justified, that wouldn’t be any fun :D would it

dpworkin's avatar

I don’t like extracting any more humanity than is necessary from the game. Same goes for baseball. Bad calls are a fact of sporting life, and there is no such thing as perfection. Try to remember these are games.

cfrydj's avatar

That goal wasn’t called back for offside. The ref thought he saw a foul in the box, and whistled the play dead before the goal was scored. The fact that there wasn’t a foul is irrelevant, and your system wouldn’t solve it. It was just a poor call, but the play was dead before the ball went in the net. That’s the nature of sport. It’s human. You could just play a computer game if you want.

ucme's avatar

FIFA (evil empire) the governing body that runs the game, have already ruled out numerous calls for goal line technology, ruling whether a ball has crossed the goal line or not.They cite that unlike other sports that use this it would interrupt the flow of the game.I agree that sport has it’s mistakes always will, but that’s half the fascination.To err is human let’s keep it that way.Besides any bad calls seem to even themselves out between teams over the years so that’s the way the cookie crumbles I guess.

Sandydog's avatar

I think its very frustrating when modern technology allows fans to have a better view of whats going on than the ref.
Worst recent example was the decision against the Irish that let France through to the finals.
I think this question will run and run for ages.

Kodewrita's avatar

It would improve goal line decisions but remove human error as a part of sports. Besides, its a door in the foot strategy. what stops them going on to request it for offside trap calls, throw-ins and tackles/dives(a la cristiano ronaldo).

Tho This world cup is providing the tech camp with a lot of fodder. Arg-Mex 1st goal, Eng-Ger disallowed equalizer e.t.c

cfrydj's avatar

Determining whether the ball crossed the goal line or not would be the only use of technology that I would like to see. Using it for handballs, offsides, etc., would change the game considerably, and turn it into something more North American, which is not what most people who enjoy the sport want.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther