Is it better to be interested, than interesting?

I say it’s best to be both. If you’re never interested in anything, you’ll learn nothing, and for those who are not naturally funny and entertaining, not being interested in learning anything will not make them interesting to be around because they have nothing of interest to say. So…there you have it.

I think both to like @NaturallyMe nobody would be interested if you didn’t have interesting. .. But if your never interested why be interesting. That would be boring.

Both, but in my experience, people who are interested—i.e., curious—are usually interesting to be around.

I agree, Both. @Austinlad says it best.

It better to be floating down the river on a raft with a margarita in your hand ;)