Emilyy's avatar
  • Last visit: February 3rd, 2010
  • Joined: October 29th, 2007
  • Flag as…

Emilyy’s profile

Emilyy’s story

Topics (18) see all

Login to see what topics you have in common with Emilyy

Login to send a message to Emilyy.

Recent messages for Emilyy

asmonet's avatar asmonet said

That’s massive amounts of fail!
Are you coming back more now?

April 8th, 2009

asmonet's avatar asmonet said

Where you been, girly?

March 24th, 2009

asmonet's avatar asmonet said

Happy Christmukkah!

December 25th, 2008

stevenb's avatar stevenb said

I really didn’t mean to be an ass. I appreciate your taking time to answer. Sometimes though, people ask a question and get no answers, just ridicule. I like answers. Thanks again.

October 21st, 2008

bodyhead's avatar bodyhead said

Here’s the addendum I send to that ladder theory guy. He never responded.

Bravo, good sir. Your theory is sound. It really should be beside it’s counterpart, the theory of relativity, in every science book in the nation.

My single complaint is that there is no part where being tall is mentioned. I’ve seen several examples of otherwise high ranking ladder participants being knocked across ladders to the friends ladder simply because they are short.

I suppose that this could be summed up in the money and power section of your pie chart

(if you happen to subscribe to the theory that
‘height + presence + money + ambition = power’).

I think the use of this simple equation could simplify the power section of the pie chart. This also beggars the question of whether height should be in the physical attraction section of the pie chart. My stance is no. The girl always seems to want a guy that is at least as tall as she is. It’s obviously a power issue and not an issue of attractiveness.

If I write out my formula and describe it, would I have a chance of your inclusion on the site? I would explain with grace and civility and would be open to any edits of course.

September 23rd, 2008