Do soft-porn actors and actresses have particularly ugly tattoos?

I was watching Cinemax (also known as Skin-emax) on cable last night – up later than I usually am due to the Oscars. Cinemax has always been the raciest of the ‘premium’ channels, but they also run some decent oldie films as well.

Anyway, it seemed that in whatever softish porn they were running at midnight Eastern, the tattoos on both the male and the female were particularly large – almost to the point of being distractingly ugly. The woman seemed to have a 4-stanza poem inked on the small of her back. But of course, to the viewer, it was unreadable and looked like a blackish blot on her skin.

How does it work? Do soft porn actors get lousier roles because they have ugly tattoos? Or so directors look for ugly tattoos and cast people in that sort of film?