- This question has been deleted.
If a Western nation or society has a practice that is seen as barbaric and archaic, how can it call the practice of another nation or society barbaric when it is all opinion?
Be it female circumcision, male circumcision to do it or not is basically dictated by society, or the populace. If done by one’s faith there really need be anything said of it. Labeling it as gross, barbaric or anything such, is opinion, and does nothing to make it a worse practice, than say abortion. People who relabeled the unborn as mere tissue, can reconcile abortion as eliminating tissue, to others that is killing a life. Circumcision of males as barbaric and unnecessary but it all comes down to custom, and the will of the parents to follow it. How it is one who has a custom considered barbaric claim another has a barbaric when it is just one opinion against another?