Send to a Friend
Can you separate the medium from the message?
)
June 8th, 2009
Linguistic asphyxia is not a plague. It points to clues why words are vague. Just bricks and mort, and I purport, that nothings built until we sort. Beneath that sort all things are planned. A wink… A nod… A popcorn stand!
Meaning equal to a word? Carve one out, it might be heard, for hearing is a thing absurd, I’ve talked with God and (it) preferred, to separate the meaning from, the words we choose to speak and drum, into the night, they thicken air, for what they hold is weighty fare.
Words are wraps, the camels hump, and meaning sits inside that lump, so pump and thump and jump and stump that grumpy chump who clumps their meaning and their word as sheep without a shepherd spurred the wolf to come and chew the fat and laugh at all from where he sat.
Are your words the same exact thing as the meaning behind them…? Or do you rightfully acknowledge that the word is only a representation of the meaning that came from your mind?
Should we look at a word to justify to our own interpretation, or shall we pursue the intentions of the one who has spoken them?
Can you separate the medium from the message?
Using Fluther
or
