Do Flutherites generally believe that one bad turn deserves another?

It seems that all too frequently on Fluther, there are exchanges that can be illustrated by the following (made up) example;

“President Obama is a loser”
“Oh yeah? Well George Bush was a loser too!!”

Is it safe to conclude that in general Flutherites believe that a dog chasing it’s tail will eventually solve anything? Or that truth and/or fallacy can be cancelled out by another unrelated truth or fallacy?
Or is this just the way most folks try to “work through” a disagreement?
(For the record, and before I become a victim of my own question, I agree with both of the above “quotes”.)