General Question

Ltryptophan's avatar

Why don't nuclear physicists reign supreme over everyone with nuclear arsenals?

Asked by Ltryptophan (12091points) March 1st, 2010

There are maybe a few thousand men on this planet who know how to really do some fun stuff with atoms. Why don’t these small groups of men play along cheerfully until they are given everything they need to create weapons that would make us all slaves to their wills? Benevolence? Scientists are incorruptible? Are the braniacs too weak? If they’re so darn nice why do they hand over their work to the guy’s with the itchy trigger fingers?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

17 Answers

Ltryptophan's avatar

Maybe they do and haven’t gotten around to letting us in on it yet.

Trillian's avatar

This from the guy who wants to use farts for energy! ;-)

jaytkay's avatar

It takes a huge number of people with different skills to make a nuclear weapon, the physicists can’t do it alone. The Manhattan Project employed over 130,000 people to build the first A-bombs.

So the ones who can wrangle whole populations (AKA national leaders) are the ones with The Button.

Captain_Fantasy's avatar

Most nuclear physicists know theory rather than application because they have no access to the expensive resources involved with the study.
Personally, I haven’t seen a good mad scientist flick in a while. I should get writing.

Ltryptophan's avatar

yeah, but out in the NM desert. 130,000 people didn’t have the button… One small clik, of the quite bright.

OperativeQ's avatar

Because they don’t make the bombs. They just figure out how to make them.

Ltryptophan's avatar

Yall are right, the physicists could never figure out complicated stuff like bomb making.

Ltryptophan's avatar

Google is working on this right now, I heard.

jaytkay's avatar

lol

Maybe physicists are temperamentally unsuited to be Lex Luthor.

hiphiphopflipflapflop's avatar

Leslie Groves had army intelligence and the FBI constantly monitoring the key people involved with the project, even Oppenheimer.

The Soviet project was under the direct oversight of Lavrentiy Beria. Enough said.

hiphiphopflipflapflop's avatar

Brains count for a lot. But authority can always throw you in a basement cell and threaten to decorate one wall of it with yours if you don’t do as you’re told.

Shuttle128's avatar

It’s really not so terribly hard…...except for getting a hold of weapons grade plutonium. You know how strict governments can be with that kind of stuff.

It takes lots of money and considerable effort to refine a fissionable mass of plutonium. Not only this but you need some sort of neutron emitter and enough high explosives to collapse the mass sufficiently quickly onto the emitter. A lot of the fission process is dependent on aeroacoustic, nuclear, chemical, and structural phenomenon. Most of these phenomenon are separated into pretty different fields of expertise.

All of these materials are highly regulated…...very highly.

-
I may have just used enough keywords in this post to have the CIA, FBI, NSA or any combination of the three knocking on my door tomorrow.

SeventhSense's avatar

I’m guessing the same reason anyone does anything

urwutuis's avatar

We and the physicists are already slaves to another master. The central bank.

SeventhSense's avatar

Nuclear Physicist nerds are really bad negotiators too.

mattbrowne's avatar

Nuclear physicists cannot do this on their own. You need experienced engineers as well. And money.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther