I especially appreciated the one apologist who tried to explain away that “they are manipulated from the start” by the requirement to sign a contract and face pressure to go on. Yeah. As if that excuses it.
It’s a tough insight into a lot of human nature. I like to think that I would have been one of the 16—I’d prefer to think that I would have turned down the invitation from the start. But I don’t know…
What @dpworkin said. That experiment caused an upheaval in the research community, and that kind of research will never be carried out legally again. It completely violates current ethical standards for research.
Which makes me wonder about it. If it was a TV production doing this, I guess they wouldn’t have to pass ethical review. But it’s a research team in France. I can’t believe they don’t have internal review boards to figure out if research is legal. The Milgram experiment is a classic and has had repercussions all over the world. I have to wonder if this story is a hoax. A little early for April Fools, but who knows?
Actually, I think it’s a brilliant retread, because it strikes at the heart of our post-future pop culture society. It’s more than simply showing us that humans easily submit to authority. It also shows how eager we are as people to consume the spectacle, and for the crowd to egg it on, as they were doing.
Milgram’s work was important, but I think this is an important update, because it’s a better mirror for our current culture. It’s not science, of course, but that’s part of the point.
@elenuial I agree with your analysis but hardly do I think that the producers of this show were anywhere on your wavelength – I personally think the show is dumb as fuck but what gratuitous show isn’t?
@Simone_De_Beauvoir A lot of artists have no idea what they’re doing consciously, even when they’re being brilliant. I wouldn’t even ascribe subconscious genius to these people, but it’s definitely an interesting and valuable artifact regardless.