Send to a Friend

Hypocrisy_Central's avatar

A better method for choosing a President, what do you think?

Asked by Hypocrisy_Central (26879points) April 14th, 2010

I think this would work better for choosing a President what about you? 1st during the campaign any person that wants to run can run, even if they are of the same party. All candidates get X amount of dollars to spend and THAT IS IT. They can divvy up the money on robocalls, print media, TV, buttons etc but when they hit that limit that is it maybe then they will spend the time telling me what they are going to do than telling everything the other person did wrong. Any other organization that tries to backdoor soft money by campaigning on behalf of the candidate will get fined $250,000 per incident; all they can do is campaign for the party but no individual. The person that does get into the White House is not paid a salary they are paid at tax time. On the tax form you have the option to award the Commander in Chief nothing up to 5 cents, no some will think a nickel ain’t nothing, but over millions of people that can add up to quite a bit for a leader most like. And on the ballot you have 2nd and 3rd runner up, so in the 1st 100 days if you don’t like the how the Commander and Chief you elected is doing you can use an ouster option and boot that person out and instill the 2nd runner up. Who would not love that method of picking a president?

Using Fluther

or

Using Email

Separate multiple emails with commas.
We’ll only use these emails for this message.