Would you come to the defence of someone opposite your position on an issue if those on your side attacked that person unjustly? Or would you remain silent?

Let’s say, hypothetically, someone asked a question regarding whether it’s beneficial to hang tomato plants upside down, or the conventional way in the ground.

And let’s say you are “pro” on this issue because it grows healthier tomatoes, uses less space, less pesticide chemicals, and is all around better for the environment.

PART 1:

Let’s say someone posted an answer asking to see proof from both sides of the argument which way is healthier and better without taking sides or being critical of either side.

Then let’s say all your allies on the “pro” side attack and flame this person, calling him ignorant because the answer is obvious to everyone who is aware of all the obscure research that your side of the issue is privileged to know.

Would you stay silent? Or would you come to the defence of this person, even though you disagree with him?

PART 2:

Now, what if this heretic went even further out on a limb and declared that everyone should be free to grow their tomatoes any way they prefer to.

And, once again, say your allies attack and flame him as being ignorant and hateful and evil for believing that people should have a choice.

Again, would you stay silent? Or would you come to the defence of this person, even though you disagree with him?