Is civil discourse dead?

Civil discourse is the art of argument without being argumentative. It means that one is able to speak about a contentious subject with others of opposing views without resorting to tirades or vitriol. It used to be the standard behavior for anyone speaking in a public forum. Sadly, I believe it has waned.

Evidence of its disappearance was seen during town hall meetings held while the health care legislation was under consideration in Washington. I saw Congressional representatives yelled at and vehemently derided. I have seen a lack of decorum here on Fluther in a few of the political discussions. Even here, the language devolved into name-calling and finger-pointing.

What has changed that makes disagreeing so disagreeable? Why can’t we talk to one another?

For what it’s worth, I’ll give my opinion. Civil discourse cannot survive in the face of rabid religiosity. Politicians and members of the public alike who are also religious zealots believe that their way is the only possible right way, because they are backed by God. With an almighty deity as their source, they run roughshod over the honest opinions of others. God trumps all.

What’s your idea?