Was the most recent Hillary v Trump 'debate ' productive? (Detail)

I’m afraid I got stuck watching the debate. It seemed both candidates concentrated on childish, hypocritical insults. But I still never really heard much in the way either candidate plans to implement their agenda.

Shouldn’t the debate have some actual substance that is relevant to the person being in office?

Both make popular proclamations, with little in the way of realistic ability to achieve such goals.

To me, it seemed they wasted the entire debate with bullshit .

I’m not a Hillary fan, but I thought that when facts were involved, and explanations were required ,she would destroy Trump. Instead, she seems to have stooped to his level.

So. Would debates be better if personal attacks weren’t allowed? Trump seems quite good at destroying his own character. Why couldn’t Hillary talk circles around him?

This ‘debate, ’ is more like a demolition durby. In the future Jerry Springer should be the moderator.

Anyone take anything else from it?