What is wrong with simply being laissez-faire regarding LGBT issues.

This question got me thinking.
http://www.fluther.com/196601/who-is-more-pro-lgbt-clinton-or-trump/
Who knows what Clinton thinks. She would say anything to serve her interests.

I bet Trump is indifferent. But his stated agenda says nothing about the LGBT constituency. So I am sure he is no threat.

But sometimes it seems to me that special interest constituencies are not satisfied that one is willing to live and let live.

The expectation is to be PRO their interest. You have to join the struggle, or you are on the wrong side.

I think that is a mistake.

You don’t get in my shit, I won’t get in yours.

If people accept that, I can easily be your friend and even your advocate

If that is not enough, you may be asking too much, which I think is annoying. I am not as accommodating when I am annoyed.

What is wrong with live and let live?