Social Question

mattbrowne's avatar

Why is there no tsunami warning system for the Atlantic Ocean?

Asked by mattbrowne (31732points) September 22nd, 2009

From Wikipedia: The 1755 Lisbon earthquake, also known as the Great Lisbon Earthquake, took place on 1 November 1755, at around 9:40 a.m. The earthquake was followed by a tsunami and fires, which caused near-total destruction of Lisbon in Portugal, and adjoining areas. Geologists today estimate the Lisbon earthquake approached magnitude 9 on the Richter scale, with an epicenter in the Atlantic Ocean about 200 km (120 mi) west-southwest of Cape St. Vincent. Estimates place the death toll in Lisbon alone between 10,000 and 100,000 people, making it one of the most destructive earthquakes in history.

Approximately forty minutes after the earthquake, an enormous tsunami engulfed the harbor and downtown. Tsunamis as tall as 20 meters (66 feet) swept the coast of North Africa, and struck Martinique and Barbados across the Atlantic. A three-meter (ten-foot) tsunami hit Cornwall on the southern English coast.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1755_Lisbon_earthquake

The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC), operated by NOAA in Ewa Beach, Hawaii, USA, is one of two tsunami warning centers in the United States. PTWC is part of an international tsunami warning system (TWS) program and serves as the operational center for TWS of the Pacific issuing bulletins and warnings to participating members and other nations in the Pacific Ocean area of responsibility. In the aftermath of the 1960 Chilean earthquake and tsunami which devastated Chile, killed dozens in Hawai`i and perhaps as many as 200 people in Japan, the nations of the Pacific decided to coordinate efforts to prevent such loss of life from ever occurring again in the Pacific Basin due to destructive ocean-crossing tsunamis. Under the auspices of the United Nations, the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) established the Intergovernmental Coordination Group for the Pacific Tsunami Warning System (ICG/PTWS) in 1968.

The Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System is a tsunami warning system set up to provide warning to inhabitants of nations bordering the Indian Ocean of approaching tsunamis. It was agreed to in a United Nations conference held in January 2005 in Kobe, Japan as an initial step towards an International Early Warning Programme. Its creation was prompted by the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and resulting tsunami, which left some 230,000 people dead or missing. Many analysts claimed that the disaster would have been mitigated if there had been an effective warning system in place, citing the well-established Hawaii-based Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, which operates in the Pacific Ocean.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Ocean_Warning_System

So here’s my question: Are we stupid enough to wait for another Lisbon-type tsunami before budgets are made available to build a tsunami warning system for the Atlantic? Are massive scale disasters the only way so things get changed? Why not be proactive for a change? We know the risks. Had a Pacific-type system been installed before 2004 for the Indian Ocean maybe only 10% of the 230,000 people would have died. Do you agree?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

10 Answers

CMaz's avatar

“Why not be proactive for a change?”

I see where you are coming from. But if it is not one thing it is another.

Being proactive costs money, and in the long run it might pay off. I see these situations as the immediate cost outweighing the long term benefit.
It is an issue of choosing your fights.
As crappy as that might sound.

oratio's avatar

This might be something the Union needs to look at sooner or later.

cwilbur's avatar

The last time there was an Atlantic tsunami was more than 250 years ago. Pacific tsunamis happen every few years. This is why there’s a tsunami warning system for the Pacific, but not for the Atlantic.

marinelife's avatar

Why do you assume there is not?

“Tsunami warning system to be tested on Atlantic, Gulf coasts in April
By Mark Schleifstein
March 23, 2009, 11:26AM

The tsunami warning announcement to be broadcast at 8 a.m. on April 2 is no April Fools Day joke.

It’s a first-ever test of a new Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico tsunami warning system designed to cue coastal communities of the potential danger of huge waves caused by earthquakes.

Co-sponsored by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the U.S. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program, the test also will include Canadian Atlantic Provinces and U.S. Caribbean Territories and Commonwealths.”

Source

YARNLADY's avatar

The protection that is in place is a good as the resources will allow. There are not many taxpayers in the various affected areas who see this as a priority.

mattbrowne's avatar

@cwilbur – From what I heard Atlantic Ocean tsunami are only slightly less frequent than the ones in the Indian Ocean. If money gets spent there, it should also be spent over here.

mattbrowne's avatar

@Marina – Thanks for the link. I wasn’t aware of this, but I’m not sure whether this is a full-fledged system that can be compared to the new one in the Indian ocean. Would it also protect Portugal, France and Ireland?

mattbrowne's avatar

@YARNLADY – If a major tsunami is approaching the taxpayers in the affected areas won’t have to worry about any more taxes. As far as I know heaven is a very large duty-free zone.

YARNLADY's avatar

@mattbrowne You’re preaching to the choir here, I’m not the one you need to convince

mattbrowne's avatar

@YARNLADY – Can I hire you as co-preacher?

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther