@Seaofclouds _ It’s not cheating. Even if the guy uses it alone, it’s just another form of masturbation. It’s no different from using any other sex toy (with or without your partner around)¬_ In a visceral sense it is different from a vibrator, a vaginal flashlight, etc. Those do not have breast, face, inviting lips, etc. You would have to have a real active imagination to be using a vaginal flashlight and conjure of the feel of hair in your fist and seeing green eyes under lashes over the top of your dumbstick as if a real woman was doing you.
@filmfann $6000 for a sex doll? Holy crap! I guess if you can afford $750 shoes, $280 sunshades, $1,200 attaché case, and $3,000 suits, a $6,000 woman that will do what you want and you don’t have to call in the morning is within the budget.
@zenvelo Why in the world would you call it cheating if the woman agreed to it? The whole premise makes absolutely no sense at all. Really? If we are playing poker, and I tell you that I am going to peek at the deck to see which card is coming up before I bet The fact that I told you that is what I am going to do, and you don’t oppose, makes me still playing by poker rules?
@wundayatta Check @Seaofclouds above. Sheesh. I know you like to try to stretch the boundaries with your questions, @Hypocrisy_Central, but this is absurd. Absurd with no room for absurd answers. I’m gonna go eat my fluther card. Being the de fact Fluther sexologist if it is too hard pass it up and go to something easier. It not absurd when you take in the account it is a visceral perception thing. Seeing what appears to be an actual woman, though cold as a slab of clay, can invoke more emotion or thought than a simple vibrator. If it didn’t I don’t think they would make them, or make them as lifelike as they do. It is that same visceral thinking that keeps people from creating a video game where the goal is to cruise schools to see how many kids you can bag or get in the back of your van. It is not real and involved no real children or images of any, all pixels and a program. Yet the intent is beyond most people’s ick factor it is illegal to do. To simply try to dismiss it as a mere “advance vibrator”, or not different than the bed or a pair of handcuff is absurd.
@Blueroses I’m giving this a GQ because it gave me a few minutes distraction trying to imagine who in the world would agree to add a Real Doll to a threesome. Fathom this for a moment, ”Cassie’s” b/f, husband, etc want to have a threesome. She don’t want to have one because she don’t want any of her friends are anyone she knows to the third The thought of having some random stranger who could have an STD or something involved is equally repugnant. As many gals do, they are willing to do crazy things to keep their beau happy. The compromise, a lifelike doll, that way he gets the fantasy, almost, of having another woman in the mix, but technically it isn’t.
Some might say it is not a real woman so it is not really cheating. Some would say it is more cheating than sexting with another woman not your mate because you are actually interacting with it from the heart and mind, not just mere words. If a woman is actually there with him and the doll it might be seen different than if she went out to visit her mom and he is getting freaky with the doll outside of her presence. The mere fact the doll looks so much like a real woman, lends the thought how one interacts with it is different. I just wanted to get some honest and intelligent opinion what the collective thought as a whole.
Composing members:
0
