Social Question

everephebe's avatar

How much time did the Kessel Run take Han Solo?

Asked by everephebe (11559 points ) May 19th, 2011

This is my attempt at a social orphan, let’s see how it goes.

Ok, so the Kessel Run took the Millennium Falcon less than 12 parsecs and that’s at .5 past lightspeed.

By my calculations that’s about 12 seconds. Of course if he was going the speed of light it would take 25+ years.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

11 Answers

Seelix's avatar

Aw. My answer was going to be “less than 12 parsecs”. Does that grant me any nerd points?

hiphiphopflipflapflop's avatar

The thing is, a parsec is a unit of distance, not time. And ”.5 past lightspeed” taken literally is gibberish as ”.5” is unit-less and can’t be added to a velocity.

Let’s face it, George Lucas just grabs stuff that falls from hind quarters and turns it into plots and dialogue.

gasman's avatar

A parsec being a unit of distance (3.26 light-years), and assuming the dialogue is taken at face value to make some kind of sense, Han’s boast of “less than 12 parsecs” apparently wasn’t his time. Perhaps it’s was a contest to get to arrive at the finish point in the shortest possible distance?!

everephebe's avatar

.5 past light speed is supposedly 150 million times the speed of light.

drdoombot's avatar

I always assumed the Kessel Run was a trip from point A to point B, perhaps with specific stops along the way, and Han Solo’s achievement was finding the shortest distance to achieve this trip.

mazingerz88's avatar

Uhm, I suck at Math. But I’m here just to give this question ONE great question points!

( Notice the “s” in points. Told you I suck in Math…or is it grammar? )

amujinx's avatar

I couldn’t tell you how long it took him, but the reason that he is known for how short of a distance it took him to get the Kessel Run done in is because there is apparently a bunch of black holes along the way, so smugglers would take a longer, safer distance from them than Han Solo did.

robmandu's avatar

For any of you Star Wars haters, you don’t really think that the zealots haven’t figured out the difference between a unit of time and a unit of distance?

From Wookieepedia:

The Kessel Run was one of the most heavily-used routes in the Galactic Empire. Han Solo claimed that his Millennium Falcon “made the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs”. A parsec was a unit of distance, not time. Solo was not referring directly to his ship’s speed when he made this claim. Instead, he was referring to the shorter route he was able to travel by skirting the nearby Maw black hole cluster, thus making the run in under the standard distance. By moving closer to the black holes, Solo managed to cut the distance down to about 11.5 parsecs.

gasman's avatar

Of course, all of this “background material” is no doubt mere apologetic backfill, compiled after the fact, to cover gaps in intelligibility of a script written for consumption by 12-year-olds, peppered with science terminology that holds up poorly to scrutiny. Should George Lucas have known better? Hard to say.

robmandu's avatar

[ off topic ]

My personal opinion is that George Lucas’ “genius” only extends as far as editing down and saying no to things that weren’t good enough for the big screen back in the late 70’s and early 80’s. George Lucas teamed with Industrial Light and Magic to create the ground-breaking special effects of the original trilogy (ex: the new camera techniques employed to shoot the asteroid chase seen in Ep. V). Even so, there’s only so much one can do with miniature models, stop-animation techniques, and muppets.

When the original trilogy was re-released in the late 90’s, George Lucas went back and added all of the stuff he wished he could’ve done the first time around… and seriously pissed off nearly every Star Wars fan alive. All the new special effects do nothing for the story and often are distracting.

My point is that, when faced with insurmountable special effects limitations, George Lucas was able to make a universe filled with unreal creatures and activities come alive by actually being creative in the film making process; sticking with what worked and dropping whatever didn’t.

He originally said no to the scene where Jabba the Hut visits Han Solo in the hangar of Ep. IV. Why? Because they couldn’t do it right. The interaction between a live actor and a giant muppet was untenable the way they wanted to shoot it. Then in the late 90’s when CGI had progressed to the point where they seemingly could construct the scene well enough, he added it back for no purpose other than his own hubris. The movie was better without that scene. He had edited it out originally due to technical limitations, but really it should’ve been dropped because it simply didn’t add anything to the story.

The prequel trilogy makes my point for me. It’s a hugely overblown CGI showpiece where Lucas threw in every little “cool” thing he could imagine… leaving us with a dragging story line, almost no wit, and character acting that could’ve been replaced with muppets to elicit a stronger emotional presentation.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther