Between the Senate Intelligence Committee, Dick Cheney and the New York Times, who is most likely "Full of crap" [Details]?

Where’s my all of the above category?

Excluded @Adirondackwannabe.

Puts you in the Cheney camp.
Everyone but ME is full of crap.

You ever put me In the Cheney camp we may come to blows.

You and Cheney, I presume.
I’d hate seeing Dicks come to blows!

Enough.
Cheney is, still and again, convinced he has the only reality/perspective.

Oh, but he’s still a Dick.

None of them are “full of crap”. But Dick Cheney is a War Criminal. Notice he won;t go to Europe because he’d be arrested upon landing and hauled before the International Court of Justice for war crimes.

The (soon-to-be-Republican) Senate “Intelligence” Committee, Conservative Dick Cheney the war criminal, the Liberal New York Times? I think the answer is obvious, depending on your political bent.

I like the New York Times. I don’t think of it as being full of crap.

Everyone’s got their own opinion on this. To me, it is not something to argue over nor is it worth arguing over.

The Senate Intelligence Committee isn’t full of crap and neither is the New York Times. That’s all I’m saying.

I don’t even know what this question is supposed to mean. It does not promote intelligent discourse.

As far as intelligent discourse is concerned, in my opinion, there are several questions on this site that do not meet that criteria.

As to the question just asked, my answer is, Dick Cheney and his first name says it all.

Let it be said, that not only is Cheney a war criminal,
he is a convicted war criminal, as are Bush and Rumsfeld.

The question is unfair. Any question that asks “Who is more full of shit” that includes Dick Cheney as an option doesn’t give any of the other options a chance.