Social Question

DaphneT's avatar

Can someone be considered a significant philosopher if they have not published a written work?

Asked by DaphneT (5750points) November 10th, 2016

Most of our western civilization is based on study of the writings of the people who have come before us. We recognize significant, influential writings as philosophy and glean, pick and chose the ideas that appeal to us. We take those ideas and shape our lives around them. If today’s thoughts haven’t been written down, published in a form that all can access, can we really call the author a significant philosopher?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

5 Answers

zenvelo's avatar

Only if the ideas are recorded in such a way that people can consider and ponder the ideas. So, a recording of a talk would be okay. But not just the speech of someone on a street corner without a way for anyone to share it.

SavoirFaire's avatar

I am going to assume that the question is restricted to contemporary philosophy since you probably already know that Socrates, who is one of the most significant Western philosophers of all time, was illiterate and never wrote down a single word of his philosophical thought.

In any case, Saul Kripke has certainly managed to become a very influential and significant philosopher despite having published virtually none of his work. Even his most famous book, Naming and Necessity, is just a transcript of three lectures he gave at Princeton a decade before it was published.

The book is actually very typical of how his ideas have managed to circulate: other philosophers share recordings of his lectures and copies of unpublished manuscripts, then cite those unpublished works in their own writings. And while it is true that his ideas exist in tangible form, they can actually be difficult to get hold of if you don’t know who to ask.

So while it is rare these days, I would say that the answer to your question is “yes.”

Zaku's avatar

Of course, unless you mean “significant to publishing” or something.

Philosophical significance doesn’t require an audience.

If a philosopher goes to the forest and learns the secret to life, the universe and everything, then maybe everyone else is the philosophically insignificant one.

ucme's avatar

Consider Ringo Starr, setting Yellow Submarine aside, he didn’t write any of the Beatles lyrics & yet is thought of as one of the “fab four” philosophy by association…word!

elbanditoroso's avatar

This sort of gets to the questions of “what is philosophy?” and “who are the great philosophers?”.

Yogi Berra had a philosophy of life that was fairly simplistic and never written down.

Mother Theresa had a philosophy of faith and carried it out through service, but she wasn’t known for her writings.

Singer /poets like Phil Ochs, Bob Dylan, and the late Leonard Cohen have introduced us to their philosophies and views through their poetry and songs. But none of them have written a philosophical treatise along the lines of Rousseau or Kant.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther