# What could be wrong with my standard curve?

Asked by ScottyMcGeester (1897) January 14th, 2015

I ran samples that have sodium chloride in them. I want to calculate though how much sodium chloride (in this case, in mM) I have in each sample.

To do this, I made up a series of sodium chloride standards. I measure the conductivity of everything – the standards and the samples.

I make a graph of the conductivity measurements I got for the standards and use the y=mx+b equation to plug in the conductance results I got from the samples and thus flesh out what sodium chloride concentration I got in there in mM.

But something is wrong with the equation and how it’s calculating the concentration.

For example:
The LOWEST value I have from my standards is a 3.63 in uS for a conductance reading. (This is water – my zero point). The LOWEST value I got from my samples is a 4.31. How is it possible that when I plug in that 4.31 in the equation to get my x value I get a negative number? It doesn’t make sense – I don’t get what’s wrong with my standard curve.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

What kind of water did you use? The chemicals and minerals in tap water I could see skewing things. Deionized water would work as a better control.

Cruiser (40449)

I’m with @Cruiser l if you aren’t using the clearest deionized water in a clean vessel, you’re contaminating your standard.

Pure water is practically an insulator, so if you’re even getting much of a reading at all from the standard, you’ve messed up. If the water were pure, you’d get about 0.055 µS/cm or about 188 kilo-ohms per meter). Your “standard” is sixty-six times that. Bad “zero point” means bad curve.

jerv (31076)

or