Does Kaddafi serve as an anti-incentive for Akmadinajad and Kim Jong-Il?
The US asked Kaddafi to give up his nukes, and he would be more welcome and embraced by the world community. He does, and then major players of the world community de facto lead by the US bombs him out of office and to his death; made way by a US drone no less. If he had kept his hunks I doubt the US along with France et al, would have had the balls to go in there to fight the civil war with the rebellion. Seeing how Kaddafi was let out to dry, what incentive would Akmadinajad and Kim Jong-Il to give up their nukes or stop trying to get them when they know not to have them leaves them vulnerable to attack? To me, hanging Kaddafi out to dry serves as a lesson to them, do not believe the West. Even if Uncle Sam would not get smacked directly the US don’t have the spine to be the reason someone in Europe or the US’s master, Israel gets it. Is it not almost assured Akmadinajad and Kim Jong-Il will never play nice now?