Social Question

talljasperman's avatar

Who would win at target practice ? (details inside)

Asked by talljasperman (21916points) December 10th, 2014

A medieval archer vs. a native american with a bow and arrow?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

8 Answers

janbb's avatar

I think they both would have to be very skilled so it is impossible to predict.

zenvelo's avatar

Hmmmm. Was listening to a podcast just this morning on Henry Hudson and one of his crewmen was killed while on a survey party around Manhattan, an error shot from a canoe, got the crewman right in the neck.

Both were skilled, but Native Americans had to hunt; medieval yeoman shot for distance.

zenvelo's avatar

^^^ arrow, not error.

talljasperman's avatar

@zenvelo That makes sense.

janbb's avatar

On the other hand, the medieval archer was almost always aiming to kill a human so that could be an advantage to him.

stanleybmanly's avatar

I believe the English longbow in the hands of a skilled archer would have a considerable edge over the best native American weapon wielded by his counterpart here. A crossbow would be so overwhelming in superiority that there would be no contest.

kritiper's avatar

Each weapon within it’s own range, no difference.

crissy14's avatar

When I think medievel, I think a rushed sort of raging war. Arrows blackening out the sky. The soldiers/knights were numerous. The Indian though, has a skill for blending with nature and having patience.

My vote is the Indian.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther