“After months of stonewalling, the FBI finally produced the unclassified document, FD-1023”
If there really was stonewalling, that seems like it’s more an FBI problem than a Biden problem.
“in which a very reliable FBI confidential human source reports a lot of issues with the Bidens.”
In which a CHS who has been found reliable in the past gave new information that a two-month investigation could not verify.
“Specifically it shows Burisma hired Hunter specifically for the access it gave to Joe”
For the access they thought would give them access to Joe, and access is not the same as influence.
“and that Joe pushed to have him hired.”
All the document says is that Joe supported the hiring. It doesn’t say he pushed for it.
“It points to 2 Bidens that got $5M each to make the investigation that Shokin, the Ukrainian State Attorney, was doing.”
It looks like you’re missing some words here. Did you mean “to make the investigation go away”? Assuming you did, the document doesn’t actually say what the payments would have been for, and in fact doesn’t even confirm they were made. The CHS even says he advised against them.
“The timeline dove-tails nicely to the time frame in which Joe Biden bragged about threatening to withhold $1B in aid to Ukraine unless they fired him within 6 hours.”
Whatever one thinks of the Bidens and Burisma, Shokin is a corrupt bastard who needed to be removed. If Biden forced him out for the wrong reasons, that’s bad. But the fact that he got rid of him (and bragged about it) are not bad on their own. So unless it can be shown that Biden removed him for corrupt reasons, the Shokin removal doesn’t move me at all.
“This shows a criminal network being run with the Bidens as big beneficiaries.”
Nothing in the document even remotely points to a criminal network. It suggests that there may have possibly been bribes. But “criminal network” implies a level of complexity and continuity that the document doesn’t itself allege.
“Does this make you consider that this is no longer just a witch hunt and that Joe Biden needs to be possibly impeached?”
Why would we jump straight to the idea that he should be impeached as opposed to letting the investigations continue? This is one document, not a full case.
“Or that Hunter Biden needs to be arrested for a variety of charges?”
Again, pending an actual criminal investigation. But as @Zaku told us, the FBI investigated this for eight months—including two months after this document was filed—and decided there was nothing there. I have no problem with people looking into it again, but I’m against jumping to conclusions just as I was during the Trump years.