General Question

stagayote54's avatar

What is the smallest thing in existence? What is the largest?

Asked by stagayote54 (123points) August 2nd, 2011

In science, what is the smallest component of matter? What is the largest non-living object or system in existence?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

19 Answers

XOIIO's avatar

Yo’ Junk and Yo’ Mama!

Galaxies would be the largest structures in existance, while quarks are the smallest particle we know of so far.

thorninmud's avatar

Neutrinos are much smaller than quarks, and of the three varieties of neutrinos, the electron neutrino has the least mass (1/5000th the mass of the lightest quark).

The largest “thing” depends on what your criteria for “thingness” is. Since every bit of matter in the universe influences every other bit of matter, the entire universe could be seen as “a thing”.

ragingloli's avatar

The smallest: the String.
The biggest: the 11 dimensional Hyperverse.

That was easy

XOIIO's avatar

@ragingloli Seen both of those. Meh

AstroChuck's avatar

Largest: My ego
Smallest: Sadly, my penis

Actually, @ragingloli is correct, if you subscribe to M-theory.

Tropical_Willie's avatar

sorry to hear that @AstroChuck

@ragingloli Has it.

thorninmud's avatar

So, are we talking about verified objects, or theorized ones?

XOIIO's avatar

@thorninmud I figure verified, with a dash of paprika and theorized

gasman's avatar

Elementary particles such as electrons and quarks appear to be point-like in extent, so they all qualify as “smallest” by appearing to have no size at all, though some have a smaller mass than others. The strings of string theory are hypothetical, hardly qualifying as “in existence.”

PhiNotPi's avatar

Photons have zero mass, followed with electron neutrinos with possibly zero mass. The biggest thing by mass would be the multiverse, or if that doesn’t exist, the universe. The most massive non-abstract objects would be supermassive black holes. VY Canis Majoris is the largest star known.

thorninmud's avatar

Photons aren’t considered a “component of matter”, though.

PhiNotPi's avatar

Then hydrogen atoms.

XOIIO's avatar

@PhiNotPi What about the protons, neutrons and electrons? thoe are obviously smaller.

PhiNotPi's avatar

Then the electron, which is even smaller than the up quark, the lightest of all quarks. I thought that @thorninmud‘s comment meant that subatomic particles where excluded, in which case the smallest atom would be hydrogen.

thorninmud's avatar

@PhiNotPi Photons are force-carrying particles, so they aren’t building blocks of matter. In the realm of actually confirmed sub-atomic particles, only quarks and leptons have been identified as the basic building blocks of matter. Leptons include electrons, muons, taus, and the three varieties of neutrinos. The electron neutrino is the smallest of all of these.

mattbrowne's avatar

Super tiny non-confirmed sub-particles fitting into one Planck length.

And galactic superclusters are the largest known objects in our universe.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther