General Question

robmandu's avatar

Got an opinion on the theological difference between "being saved" and "demon possession"?

Asked by robmandu (21285points) March 19th, 2008

Came up in another thread. Got me to wondering.

Terminology for your perusal prior to response:
Born again
Spiritual possession
– do your own Google search

Last thing I’m trying to do here is push a religious agenda. If you’ve got input to the semantic, etymological differences or if you have personal insight and experience, bring it on.

Don’t like the topic, then move on.

Very interested in viewpoint from agnostic, atheist, pagan, secular, whatever belief systems… although I expect that the various flavors of Christian denominations have their say.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

1 Answer

cwilbur's avatar

I think being “born again” is a precondition for being saved, because being saved requires a conscious choice; however, the phrase “born again” has a lot of connotations that I don’t care for in 21st century American Christian practice, and so I prefer not to use it.

I think God accepts everyone who accepts God, and I do not believe that a God capable of forgiving everything else will not forgive ignorance. I believe that Hell is the state of being willfully apart from God, and that God does not damn people to Hell, but that people damn themselves to Hell – and that they can un-damn themselves at any time they want.

From your Wikipedia link: “Spiritual possession is when ghosts (demons, devils, negative energies etc.) control the mind (emotions, thoughts) and intellect (decision making ability) of a person. As a result, they also control the person’s actions.”

This is qualitatively different from being saved, or even from being inspired by the Holy Spirit; the greatest gift God gave us is free will, and He does not take that away no matter what. Without the freedom to do evil, the choice to do good is meaningless, and so God, Who prefers that we do good, but Who loves us enough to give us free will, does not take away that choice, and does not judge us for our actions when the inability to choose good is taken away from us.

As a result, demonic possession is qualitatively different: if the possessing entity takes away the ability to do good or prevents the possessed person from being able to discern what is good and evil, then the inability to do anything but evil and the conscious choice to do something perceived as good when it is actually evil are both spiritually meaningless. It’s the choice to do evil when there is a possibility of doing good that matters.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.

This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.

Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther