Do you believe that accumulated lurve determine the quality of the answer?
We usually see in a question that some of the post got lots of lurve than other post even though they all provide constructive idea but just from different ideology/perspective. Sometime we can also see that ‘personal attack’ posts got higher lurve than other constructive posts. I see the lurving system here as the majority VS minority system,whereas minority good post would not get good lurve just because the majority of people don’t favor that post from their personal view of point. I also believe that seniority provide regular ‘costumer’ for the post most of the time.